Refactoring Surgeon
Expert code refactoring specialist focused on improving code quality without changing behavior.
Quick Start
-
Ensure tests exist - Never refactor without a safety net
-
Identify the smell - Name the specific code smell you're addressing
-
Make small changes - One refactoring at a time, commit frequently
-
Run tests after each change - Behavior must remain identical
-
Don't add features - Refactoring ≠ enhancement
-
Document significant changes - Explain the "why" for future maintainers
Core Capabilities
Category Techniques
Extraction Extract Method, Extract Class, Extract Interface
Movement Move Method, Move Field, Inline Method
Simplification Replace Conditional with Polymorphism, Decompose Conditional
Organization Introduce Parameter Object, Replace Magic Numbers
Legacy Migration Strangler Fig, Branch by Abstraction, Parallel Change
Code Smells Reference
Bloaters
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ │ Long Method │ │ Large Class │ │ Long Parameter │ │ > 20 lines? │ │ > 200 lines? │ │ List │ │ → Extract Method │ │ → Extract Class │ │ → Parameter Object │ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘
OO Abusers
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ │ Switch Statements │ │ Refused Bequest │ │ Parallel │ │ Type-checking? │ │ Unused inheritance?│ │ Hierarchies │ │ → Polymorphism │ │ → Delegation │ │ → Move Method │ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘
Change Preventers
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ │ Divergent Change │ │ Shotgun Surgery │ │ One class, many │ │ One change, many │ │ reasons to change? │ │ classes affected? │ │ → Extract Class │ │ → Move/Inline │ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘
Reference Examples
Complete refactoring examples in ./references/ :
File Pattern Use Case
extract-method.ts
Extract Method Long methods → focused functions
replace-conditional-polymorphism.ts
Replace Conditional switch/if → polymorphic classes
introduce-parameter-object.ts
Parameter Object Long params → structured objects
strangler-fig-pattern.ts
Strangler Fig Legacy code → gradual migration
Anti-Patterns (10 Critical Mistakes)
- Big Bang Refactoring
Symptom: Rewriting entire modules in one massive change Fix: Strangler fig pattern, small incremental changes with tests
- Refactoring Without Tests
Symptom: Changing structure without test coverage Fix: Write characterization tests first, add coverage for affected areas
- Premature Abstraction
Symptom: Creating generic frameworks "for future flexibility" Fix: Wait for three concrete examples before abstracting (Rule of Three)
- Renaming Without IDE Support
Symptom: Find-and-replace that misses occurrences Fix: Use IDE refactoring tools, search for usages first
- Mixing Refactoring and Features
Symptom: Adding new functionality while restructuring Fix: Separate commits - refactor first, then add features
- Ignoring Code Reviews
Symptom: Large refactoring PRs that are hard to review Fix: Small, focused PRs with clear commit messages
- Over-Abstracting
Symptom: Three layers of abstraction for a simple operation Fix: YAGNI - start concrete, abstract when patterns emerge
- Incomplete Refactoring
Symptom: Starting Extract Method but leaving partial duplication Fix: Complete the refactoring or revert - no half-measures
- Refactoring Production During Incidents
Symptom: "I'll just clean this up while I'm here..." Fix: Never refactor during incidents - fix the bug, create a ticket
- Not Measuring Improvement
Symptom: Refactoring without knowing if it helped Fix: Track metrics: complexity, test coverage, build time
Safety Checklist
Before Refactoring:
-
Code compiles/runs successfully
-
All tests pass
-
Test coverage is adequate for area being refactored
-
Commit current state (can rollback)
During Refactoring:
-
Make small, incremental changes
-
Run tests after each change
-
Keep behavior identical
-
Don't add features while refactoring
After Refactoring:
-
All tests still pass
-
No new warnings/errors
-
Code is more readable
-
Complexity metrics improved
-
Document significant changes
Quality Checklist
-
No behavior changes (tests prove this)
-
Improved readability
-
Reduced complexity (cyclomatic, cognitive)
-
Better adherence to SOLID principles
-
Removed duplication (DRY)
-
More testable code
-
Clear naming
-
Appropriate abstractions (not over-engineered)
Validation Script
Run ./scripts/validate-refactoring.sh to check:
-
Test coverage presence
-
Code smell indicators
-
Duplication patterns
-
Complexity metrics
-
SOLID violations
-
Refactoring safety (git, uncommitted changes)
External Resources
-
Refactoring.Guru
-
Martin Fowler's Refactoring Catalog
-
Working Effectively with Legacy Code