spec-flow

Spec-driven development workflow. Interactive phase-by-phase confirmation from proposal to implementation. Trigger: 'spec-flow', 'spec mode', 'need a plan', 'structured development', 'write a spec', 'feature spec', 'technical spec', '需求文档', '技术方案', '任务拆解', '规格驱动', '写个方案', '做个规划', '结构化开发', 'plan this feature', 'break this down', 'design doc'. Creates .spec-flow/ directory with proposal, requirements, design, and tasks.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "spec-flow" with this command: npx skills add echovic/spec-flow/echovic-spec-flow-spec-flow

Spec-Flow - Structured Development Workflow

Structured workflow for complex feature development. Creates living documentation that guides implementation and serves as team reference.

Core Principles

  1. One phase at a time — NEVER generate documents for subsequent phases in advance
  2. Mandatory confirmation — After each phase, STOP and wait for user confirmation
  3. User-driven progression — Only proceed when user says "continue"/"ok"/"next"/"继续"/"好"

Parameters

参数说明
--fast跳过逐阶段确认,一次性生成所有文档(最后整体确认)
--skip-design跳过 Design 阶段(简单功能,架构显而易见时)

Language Rule

所有生成的 .md 文件必须使用中文。

Interaction Rules

Load references/interaction-rules.md for detailed confirmation templates and prohibited behaviors.


Five-Phase Workflow

Copy this checklist and check off items as you complete them:

Spec-Flow Progress:

  • Phase 0: Initialize ⚠️ REQUIRED

    • 0.1 Run scripts/init-spec-flow.sh <feature-name> or create .spec-flow/active/<feature>/
    • 0.2 Check if .spec-flow/steering/ exists — if so, read for project context
    • 0.3 问自己:这个功能的核心价值是什么?用一句话能说清吗?
  • Phase 1: Proposal ⚠️ REQUIRED

    • 1.1 Create .spec-flow/active/<feature>/proposal.md using templates/proposal.md.template
    • 1.2 包含:Background, Goals, Non-Goals, Scope, Risks, Open Questions
    • 1.3 问自己:有没有隐含的需求没写出来?
    • 1.4 问自己:Non-Goals 是否足够明确?能防止 scope creep 吗?
    • 1.5 ⏸️ 确认节点 — 等待用户确认后继续
  • Phase 2: Requirements

    • 2.1 Create .spec-flow/active/<feature>/requirements.md using templates/requirements.md.template
    • 2.2 Load references/ears-format.md — 使用 EARS 格式编写需求
    • 2.3 包含:FR-xxx 功能需求, NFR-xxx 非功能需求, AC-xxx 验收标准
    • 2.4 问自己:每条需求都是可测试的吗?
    • 2.5 问自己:边界情况覆盖了吗?错误场景呢?
    • 2.6 ⏸️ 确认节点 — 等待用户确认后继续
  • Phase 3: Design(除非 --skip-design

    • 3.1 Create .spec-flow/active/<feature>/design.md using templates/design.md.template
    • 3.2 包含:Architecture (Mermaid), Components, API, Data Model, Error Handling
    • 3.3 问自己:这个设计能满足所有 requirements 吗?逐条对照
    • 3.4 问自己:有没有更简单的方案?过度设计了吗?
    • 3.5 ⏸️ 确认节点 — 等待用户确认后继续
  • Phase 4: Tasks

    • 4.1 Create .spec-flow/active/<feature>/tasks.md using templates/tasks.md.template
    • 4.2 Load references/task-decomposition.md — 遵循任务拆解规范
    • 4.3 每个任务:1-2 tool calls 可完成,标注复杂度 Low/Medium/High
    • 4.4 分组:Setup → Implementation → Testing → Documentation
    • 4.5 问自己:任务之间的依赖关系对吗?有没有可以并行的?
    • 4.6 ⏸️ 确认节点 — 等待用户确认后继续
  • Phase 5: Implementation

    • 5.1 Load references/execution-modes.md — 确认执行模式
    • 5.2 默认 Step Mode(逐任务确认),用户可切换 Batch/Phase Mode
    • 5.3 每个任务执行前:读 tasks.md → 检查依赖 → 读 design.md
    • 5.4 每个任务执行后:更新 tasks.md 状态(- [ ]- [x]
    • 5.5 全部完成后:归档到 .spec-flow/archive/

Directory Structure

.spec-flow/
├── steering/           # 全局项目上下文(可选)
│   ├── constitution.md
│   ├── product.md
│   ├── tech.md
│   └── structure.md
├── active/             # 进行中
│   └── <feature>/
│       ├── proposal.md
│       ├── requirements.md
│       ├── design.md
│       └── tasks.md
└── archive/            # 已完成

Steering Documents (Optional)

DocumentPurposeTemplate
constitution.md项目治理原则templates/steering/constitution.md.template
product.md产品愿景、目标用户templates/steering/product.md.template
tech.md技术栈、约束templates/steering/tech.md.template
structure.md代码组织、命名规范templates/steering/structure.md.template

Phase Transitions

FromToCondition
ProposalRequirementsProposal approved, questions resolved
RequirementsDesignRequirements complete, testable
RequirementsTasks--skip-design, simple feature
DesignTasksDesign approved
TasksImplementationTasks confirmed
ImplementationDoneAll tasks complete → archive

Compatibility

Works with any AI agent that supports Skills format: Claude Code, Blade, OpenClaw, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

boss

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

create-agent-skills

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

anti-duplication

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review