Session Debug
Analyze session debugging data to identify errors and issues that may have caused a user-reported problem.
Arguments
-
$ARGUMENTS : Two space-separated arguments expected:
-
URL to a JSON file containing session debugging data (starts with http:// or https:// )
-
GitHub issue number or URL
Instructions
Parse and validate the arguments:
Split $ARGUMENTS on whitespace to get exactly two arguments:
-
First argument: session data URL (must start with http:// or https:// )
-
Second argument: GitHub issue identifier (number like 123 or full URL like https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123 )
Validation: If fewer than two arguments are provided, inform the user:
"Usage: /dyad:session-debug " "Example: /dyad:session-debug https://example.com/session.json 123"
Then stop execution.
Fetch the GitHub issue:
gh issue view <issue-number> --json title,body,comments,labels
Understand:
-
What problem the user is reporting
-
Steps to reproduce (if provided)
-
Expected vs actual behavior
-
Any error messages the user mentioned
Fetch the session debugging data:
Use WebFetch to retrieve the JSON session data from the provided URL.
Analyze the session data:
Look for suspicious entries including:
-
Errors: Any error messages, stack traces, or exception logs
-
Warnings: Warning-level log entries that may indicate problems
-
Failed requests: HTTP errors, timeout failures, connection issues
-
Unexpected states: Null values where data was expected, empty responses
-
Timing anomalies: Unusually long operations, timeouts
-
User actions before failure: What the user did leading up to the issue
Correlate with the reported issue:
For each suspicious entry found, assess:
-
Does the timing match when the user reported the issue occurring?
-
Does the error message relate to the feature/area the user mentioned?
-
Could this error cause the symptoms the user described?
Rank the findings:
Create a ranked list of potential causes, ordered by likelihood:
Most Likely Causes
1. [Error/Issue Name]
- Evidence: What was found in the session data
- Timestamp: When it occurred
- Correlation: How it relates to the reported issue
- Confidence: High/Medium/Low
2. [Error/Issue Name]
...
Provide recommendations:
For each high-confidence finding, suggest:
-
Where in the codebase to investigate
-
Potential root causes
-
Suggested fixes if apparent
Summarize:
-
Total errors/warnings found
-
Top 3 most likely causes
-
Recommended next steps for investigation