prioritize

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ask user whether to skip.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "prioritize" with this command: npx skills add duc01226/easyplatform/duc01226-easyplatform-prioritize

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ask user whether to skip.

Quick Summary

Goal: Order 3+ backlog items using RICE, MoSCoW, or Value-Effort frameworks with scores and rationale.

Workflow:

  • Collect Items — Read from files or parse inline list (minimum 3 items)

  • Select Framework — RICE (quantitative), MoSCoW (stakeholder alignment), Value-Effort (quick decision)

  • Score Each Item — Apply framework criteria and calculate scores

  • Rank and Report — Output prioritized table with rationale and recommendations

Key Rules:

  • Minimum 3 items required; fewer than 3 should be discussed directly

  • Default to RICE if unsure; ask user if ambiguous

  • Optionally update PBI file priority fields after ranking

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Backlog Prioritization

Order backlog items using data-driven prioritization frameworks to produce a ranked list with scores and rationale.

When to Use

  • Sprint planning needs an ordered backlog (3+ items to rank)

  • Stakeholders need a priority ranking with justification

  • Feature roadmap ordering with objective criteria

  • Comparing competing features or initiatives

When NOT to Use

  • Fewer than 3 items (just discuss directly)

  • Creating PBIs or writing stories -- use product-owner or story

  • Full product strategy -- use product-owner

  • Project status tracking -- use project-manager

Prerequisites

  • A list of 3+ backlog items (PBIs, features, or user stories)

  • IF items exist as files: read from team-artifacts/pbis/ or user-provided path

  • IF items provided inline: use the provided descriptions

Workflow

Collect items to prioritize

  • IF file path provided -> read items from files

  • IF inline list -> parse items from user message

  • IF fewer than 3 items -> ask user for more or suggest direct discussion

Select framework using decision tree:

IF quantitative data available (reach, metrics) -> RICE IF stakeholder alignment needed (must/should/could) -> MoSCoW IF quick decision needed (2 axes only) -> Value-Effort 2x2 IF user specifies framework -> use that framework IF unsure -> ask user, default RICE

Score each item using selected framework:

RICE:

Score = (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort

Reach: Users affected per quarter (number) Impact: 0.25 (minimal) | 0.5 (low) | 1 (medium) | 2 (high) | 3 (massive) Confidence: 0.5 (low) | 0.8 (medium) | 1.0 (high) Effort: Story points (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21) — see .claude/skills/shared/estimation-framework.md

MoSCoW:

Must Have: Critical for release, non-negotiable Should Have: Important but not vital, workarounds exist Could Have: Desirable, include if capacity allows Won't Have: Out of scope for this cycle

Value-Effort 2x2:

High Value + Low Effort = Quick Wins (do first) High Value + High Effort = Strategic (plan carefully) Low Value + Low Effort = Fill-ins (if time permits) Low Value + High Effort = Time Sinks (avoid)

Rank items by score (descending for RICE, category for MoSCoW, quadrant for V-E)

Output prioritized list with scores and rationale

IF PBI files exist -> optionally update priority field in frontmatter (numeric 1-999)

Output Format

Prioritized Backlog

Framework: [RICE | MoSCoW | Value-Effort] Date: [YYMMDD] Items scored: [count]

Rankings

RankItemScoreRationale
1Feature A45.0High reach (5000), high impact (3), high confidence
2Feature B12.0Medium reach (2000), medium impact, low effort
3Feature C2.5Low reach, minimal impact, high effort

Recommendations

  • Do first: [top items]
  • Plan next: [medium items]
  • Defer: [low items with reasoning]

Examples

Example 1: RICE scoring of 5 features

Input: "Prioritize: SSO login, dark mode, export to PDF, email notifications, bulk import"

Output:

Rank Feature Reach Impact Conf Effort RICE

1 Email notifications 5000 2 0.8 1 8000

2 SSO login 2000 3 0.8 3 1600

3 Bulk import 500 2 1.0 1 1000

4 Export to PDF 1000 1 0.8 2 400

5 Dark mode 3000 0.5 0.5 2 375

Example 2: MoSCoW categorization

Input: "Categorize for Q1 release: payment gateway, admin dashboard redesign, API rate limiting, user avatars, audit logs"

Output:

  • Must Have: Payment gateway (revenue-critical), API rate limiting (security)

  • Should Have: Audit logs (compliance, workaround exists with manual exports)

  • Could Have: Admin dashboard redesign (improves efficiency but current works)

  • Won't Have: User avatars (nice-to-have, defer to Q2)

Related Skills

Skill When to use instead

product-owner

Full product management workflow

story

Breaking PBIs into user stories

refine

Refining ideas into PBIs

project-manager

Sprint/project status and tracking

IMPORTANT Task Planning Notes (MUST FOLLOW)

  • Always plan and break work into many small todo tasks

  • Always add a final review todo task to verify work quality and identify fixes/enhancements

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

pdf-to-markdown

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

markdown-to-docx

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

docx-to-markdown

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review