[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting.

Prerequisites: MUST READ before executing:

• .claude/skills/shared/web-research-protocol.md

OOP & DRY Enforcement: MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST — flag duplicated patterns that should be extracted to a base class, generic, or helper. Classes in the same group or suffix (ex *Entity, *Dto, *Service, etc...) MUST inherit a common base (even if empty now — enables future shared logic and child overrides). Verify project has code linting/analyzer configured for the stack.

Quick Summary

Goal: Review knowledge artifacts for quality, completeness, and protocol compliance.

Workflow:

• Read artifact — Load the knowledge report/course/strategy

• Template compliance — Verify all enforced sections present

• Citation audit — Check inline citations and source table

• Confidence check — Verify scores match evidence

• Output review — Summary with pass/warn/fail per check

Key Rules:

• Every section from template must be present and non-empty

• Every factual claim must have inline citation

• Confidence scores must match evidence basis

• READ-ONLY — do not modify the artifact

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Knowledge Review

Review Checklist

1. Template Compliance

• All enforced sections present

• No sections are empty placeholders

• Section order matches template

2. Citation Audit

• Every factual claim has inline citation [N]

• Every source in Sources table is referenced in text

• No orphan citations

• Sources table has: Title, URL, Author, Date, Tier

3. Confidence Accuracy

• Per-finding confidence scores declared

• Overall confidence declared

• Scores match evidence basis (not inflated)

• Findings <60% flagged prominently

4. Source Quality

• Tier distribution appropriate (not all Tier 4)

• At least 50% Tier 1-2 sources for key claims

• Recency appropriate for topic type

5. Knowledge Gaps

• Gaps section is present and honest

• Known limitations declared

• Suggestions for further research included

6. Cross-Validation

• Key claims verified by 2+ sources

• Discrepancies noted where sources conflict

• Single-source claims marked as unverified

7. Actionability

• Recommendations are concrete (not vague)

• Next steps are evidence-based

• Executive summary captures key findings

Output Format

Knowledge Review Result

Status: PASS | WARN | FAIL Artifact: {path}

Checks (N/7 passed)

• Template compliance
• Citation audit
• Confidence accuracy — {issue}
• Source quality — {issue} ...

Issues

• {specific issues found}

Verdict

{APPROVED | REVISE | BLOCKED}

IMPORTANT Task Planning Notes (MUST FOLLOW)

• Always plan and break work into many small todo tasks using TaskCreate

• Always add a final review todo task to verify work quality and identify fixes/enhancements