[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting.
Prerequisites: MUST READ before executing:
- .claude/skills/shared/web-research-protocol.md
External Memory: For complex or lengthy work (research, analysis, scan, review), write intermediate findings and final results to a report file in plans/reports/ — prevents context loss and serves as deliverable.
Evidence Gate: MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST — every claim, finding, and recommendation requires file:line proof or traced evidence with confidence percentage (>80% to act, <80% must verify first).
Quick Summary
Goal: Deep-dive into top sources, extract key findings, cross-validate claims, build structured evidence base.
Workflow:
-
Read source map — Load output from web-research step
-
Fetch top sources — WebFetch top 5-8 Tier 1-2 sources
-
Extract findings — Pull key facts, data points, quotes
-
Cross-validate — Compare findings across sources
-
Build evidence base — Structured findings with confidence scores
Key Rules:
-
Maximum 8 WebFetch calls per invocation
-
Every finding must cite specific source
-
Conflicting claims → present both, flag discrepancy
Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
Deep Research
Step 1: Load Source Map
Read the source map from .claude/tmp/_sources-{slug}.md (output of web-research step).
Prioritize sources for deep-dive:
-
Tier 1-2 sources first
-
High-relevance sources
-
Sources covering identified gaps
Step 2: Fetch Top Sources
For each priority source (max 8):
-
Run WebFetch with the URL
-
Extract: key claims, data points, quotes, methodology
-
Note: publication date, author credentials, source type
Step 3: Extract Findings
For each source, extract:
-
Key claims — factual statements with specific data
-
Data points — numbers, percentages, dates
-
Quotes — notable expert statements
-
Methodology — how data was gathered (for market reports)
Step 4: Cross-Validate
Compare findings across sources:
-
Agreement — 2+ sources say the same thing → high confidence
-
Discrepancy — sources disagree → note both positions
-
Unique — only 1 source → mark as "single source, unverified"
Step 5: Build Evidence Base
Write to .claude/tmp/_evidence-{slug}.md :
Evidence Base: {Topic}
Date: {date} Sources analyzed: {count}
Findings
Finding 1: {Title}
Confidence: {95%|80%|60%|<60%} Sources: [1], [3] Content: {finding with inline citations} Cross-validation: {agreement/discrepancy notes}
Unresolved Discrepancies
- {claim X from source A vs claim Y from source B}
Gaps Remaining
- {what couldn't be verified}
IMPORTANT Task Planning Notes (MUST FOLLOW)
-
Always plan and break work into many small todo tasks using TaskCreate
-
Always add a final review todo task to verify work quality and identify fixes/enhancements
Workflow Recommendation
IMPORTANT MUST: If you are NOT already in a workflow, use AskUserQuestion to ask the user:
-
Activate research workflow (Recommended) — web-research → deep-research → synthesis → review
-
Execute /deep-research directly — run this skill standalone
Next Steps
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST after completing this skill, use AskUserQuestion to recommend:
-
"/business-evaluation (Recommended)" — Evaluate business viability from research
-
"/knowledge-synthesis" — If synthesizing research report
-
"Skip, continue manually" — user decides
Closing Reminders
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST validate decisions with user via AskUserQuestion — never auto-decide. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST add a final review todo task to verify work quality.