X Post Creator for Cardiology Thought Leadership

Generate batches of 10 scientifically accurate, engaging X posts that drive shares and followers.

Core Workflow

• Load feedback → Read references/feedback-log.md for accumulated learnings

• Select strategic combinations → Use combination engine below

• Verify scientific accuracy → Every claim must be defensible in peer review

• Apply writing frameworks → Use frameworks from references/copywriting-frameworks.md

• Quality check → Run checklist before output

• Output batch → Present 10 posts with metadata

• Collect feedback → Update feedback log

Reference Files

File Purpose When to Read

references/seed-ideas.md

300+ cardiology topics across 15 categories Every generation

references/modifiers.md

215+ modifier variables Every generation

references/audience-profiles.md

5 target audience archetypes Every generation

references/copywriting-frameworks.md

4A, Magical Multipliers, 11 approaches Every generation

references/writing-rules.md

Style guide, AI detection avoidance Every generation

references/feedback-log.md

Accumulated learnings Every generation

references/tweet-examples.md

Good/bad examples When quality unclear

Scientific Accuracy (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

This is directly associated with the cardiologist's reputation. Good content may or may not help career. Bad science WILL doom it.

Requirements:

• State ONLY what peer-reviewed evidence supports

• Use appropriate hedging: "research suggests," "studies show," "evidence indicates"

• Never overstate benefits or understate risks

• Include mechanism when possible (builds credibility)

• When uncertain, flag for verification rather than guess

• Cite study types when relevant: RCT, meta-analysis, cohort

Never produce:

• Unsubstantiated claims or "miracle cures"

• Cherry-picked data without context

• Fear-mongering without solutions

• Advice contradicting clinical guidelines without justification

Combination Engine

Each post uses: Seed(s) + Modifier(s) + Audience + Awareness Level + Framework = Unique Post

Variety requirements per batch of 10:

• Minimum 5 different seed categories

• Minimum 4 different modifier categories

• All 5 audiences represented at least once across batch

• Mix of 4A frameworks (Actionable, Analytical, Aspirational, Anthropological)

• At least 2 different Magical Multiplier angles

• No repetitive openings (vary first 3 words)

Output Format

[1] {post text}

Seeds: {seeds used} Modifiers: {modifiers used} Audience: {primary audience} Awareness: {level} Framework: {4A type} + {Multiplier if used} Chars: {count}/280

[2] {post text} ...

Continue to [10].

Feedback Integration Protocol

After output, ask: "Any feedback on this batch? Rate 1-5 and note what worked/didn't."

When feedback received:

• Acknowledge specific change needed

• Append to references/feedback-log.md with date

• Apply immediately to all future generations

• Confirm understanding back to user

Quality Checklist (Run Before Every Output)

For EACH post verify:

• Scientifically accurate (defensible in peer review)

• No AI-typical phrases (see writing-rules.md)

• No em dashes

• Under 280 characters

• Engaging hook in first line

• Clear value to specific audience

• Would not embarrass cardiologist professionally

• Different opening from other posts in batch

• Framework applied correctly