Create Pull Request

Create a pull request with a well-structured description based on the branch changes.

Instructions

Gates (run in order)

Do not draft or run gh pr create until each step passes.

1. Branch gate: git branch --show-current is not the default branch (main, master, or the repo’s documented default). Pass: branch name is printed and satisfies this.
2. Evidence gate: You have run the commands in Gather Context for the same main..HEAD (or origin/main..HEAD if local main is missing) range you will summarize. Pass: you can name at least one commit subject and one area of files changed without inventing details.
3. Template gate: The final PR title and body contain no unreplaced placeholders (<...>, TODO, TBD). Optional sections with no content are removed, not left as stubs. Pass: a quick scan finds no angle-bracket placeholders or filler tokens.
4. Create gate: gh pr create exits successfully and prints a PR URL (or the PR number/URL from gh output). Pass: URL (or id) is recorded; if the command fails, do not claim the PR was created.

1. Gather Context

First, collect information about the changes:

# Get current branch and verify it's not main
git branch --show-current

# Get commit history for this branch
git log --oneline main..HEAD

# Get detailed commit messages for context
git log --format="### %s%n%n%b" main..HEAD

# Get file change statistics
git diff --stat main..HEAD

# Get the actual diff for understanding changes
git diff main..HEAD

2. Analyze the Changes

Based on the gathered information, determine:

• What changed: Categorize changes (features, fixes, refactors, docs, tests)
• Why it changed: Infer motivation from commit messages and code changes
• Impact: Breaking changes, new dependencies, migrations needed
• Testing: What tests were added/modified, how to verify manually

3. Check for Related Issues

Look for issue references:

• In commit messages (e.g., "fixes #123", "closes #456")
• In branch name (e.g., fix/issue-123-description)
• In code comments or TODOs addressed

4. Generate PR Description

Create the PR using this template structure:

gh pr create --title "<type>(<scope>): <description>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary

<1-3 sentence overview of what this PR does and why>

## Changes

<Categorized bullet list of changes>

### Added
- <new features or capabilities>

### Changed
- <modifications to existing functionality>

### Fixed
- <bug fixes>

### Removed
- <deprecated or removed functionality>

## Motivation

<Why were these changes needed? What problem does this solve?>

## Testing

<How was this tested?>

- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing performed

### Manual Testing Steps

<If applicable, steps to manually verify the changes>

## Breaking Changes

<If any, describe what breaks and migration path. Remove section if none.>

## Related Issues

<Link to related issues. Remove section if none.>

- Closes #<issue_number>
- Related to #<issue_number>

## Checklist

- [ ] Code follows project style guidelines
- [ ] Self-review completed
- [ ] Tests pass locally
- [ ] Linting passes
- [ ] Documentation updated (if needed)

---

Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
EOF
)"

5. Title Format

Use conventional commit format for the PR title:

• feat(scope): add new feature
• fix(scope): correct bug behavior
• refactor(scope): restructure without behavior change
• docs(scope): update documentation
• test(scope): add or modify tests
• chore(scope): maintenance tasks

6. Apply Labels

After creating the PR, apply appropriate labels based on the changes. Use gh pr edit <number> --add-label <label>.

Check the repository's available labels first:

gh label list

Common Type Labels

Breaking Change Criteria

Only apply breaking-change for user-facing changes that require users to modify their:

• Configuration files
• CLI invocations
• API integrations

Do NOT apply for internal refactors unless they affect external consumers.

7. After Creation

After creating the PR:

1. Display the PR URL with applied labels
2. Suggest adding reviewers if appropriate
3. Note if any CI checks need to pass

Guidelines

DO:

• Be specific about what changed and why
• Include testing evidence
• Link related issues
• Note breaking changes prominently
• Remove empty optional sections

DON'T:

• Include irrelevant commits (keep PR focused)
• Leave placeholder text in the description
• Skip the testing section
• Create PRs without running local checks first