react-composition-patterns

# React Composition Patterns

Safety Notice

This listing is from the official public ClawHub registry. Review SKILL.md and referenced scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "react-composition-patterns" with this command: npx skills add wpank/composition-patterns

React Composition Patterns

Build flexible, maintainable React components using compound components, context providers, and explicit variants. Avoid boolean prop proliferation.

WHAT

Composition patterns that scale:

  • Compound components with shared context
  • State/actions/meta context interface for dependency injection
  • Explicit variant components over boolean props
  • Lifted state in provider components
  • Children composition over render props

WHEN

  • Refactoring components with many boolean props
  • Building reusable component libraries
  • Designing flexible component APIs
  • Creating compound components (Card, Dialog, Form, etc.)
  • Components need shared state across sibling elements

KEYWORDS

composition, compound components, context, provider, boolean props, variants, react patterns, component architecture, render props, children

Source: Vercel Engineering

Installation

OpenClaw / Moltbot / Clawbot

npx clawhub@latest install composition-patterns

Core Principle

Avoid boolean prop proliferation. Each boolean doubles possible states.

// BAD: 4 booleans = 16 possible states
<Composer isThread isDMThread isEditing isForwarding />

// GOOD: Explicit variants, clear intent
<ThreadComposer channelId="abc" />
<EditComposer messageId="xyz" />

Pattern 1: Compound Components

Structure complex components with shared context. Consumers compose what they need.

const ComposerContext = createContext<ComposerContextValue | null>(null)

// Provider handles state
function ComposerProvider({ children, state, actions, meta }: ProviderProps) {
  return (
    <ComposerContext value={{ state, actions, meta }}>
      {children}
    </ComposerContext>
  )
}

// Subcomponents access context
function ComposerInput() {
  const { state, actions: { update }, meta: { inputRef } } = use(ComposerContext)
  return (
    <TextInput
      ref={inputRef}
      value={state.input}
      onChangeText={(text) => update(s => ({ ...s, input: text }))}
    />
  )
}

function ComposerSubmit() {
  const { actions: { submit } } = use(ComposerContext)
  return <Button onPress={submit}>Send</Button>
}

// Export as namespace
const Composer = {
  Provider: ComposerProvider,
  Frame: ComposerFrame,
  Input: ComposerInput,
  Submit: ComposerSubmit,
  Header: ComposerHeader,
  Footer: ComposerFooter,
}

Usage:

<Composer.Provider state={state} actions={actions} meta={meta}>
  <Composer.Frame>
    <Composer.Header />
    <Composer.Input />
    <Composer.Footer>
      <Composer.Formatting />
      <Composer.Submit />
    </Composer.Footer>
  </Composer.Frame>
</Composer.Provider>

Pattern 2: Generic Context Interface

Define a contract any provider can implement: state, actions, meta.

interface ComposerState {
  input: string
  attachments: Attachment[]
  isSubmitting: boolean
}

interface ComposerActions {
  update: (updater: (state: ComposerState) => ComposerState) => void
  submit: () => void
}

interface ComposerMeta {
  inputRef: React.RefObject<TextInput>
}

interface ComposerContextValue {
  state: ComposerState
  actions: ComposerActions
  meta: ComposerMeta
}

Same UI, different providers:

// Local state provider
function ForwardMessageProvider({ children }) {
  const [state, setState] = useState(initialState)
  return (
    <ComposerContext value={{
      state,
      actions: { update: setState, submit: useForwardMessage() },
      meta: { inputRef: useRef(null) },
    }}>
      {children}
    </ComposerContext>
  )
}

// Global synced state provider  
function ChannelProvider({ channelId, children }) {
  const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId)
  return (
    <ComposerContext value={{
      state,
      actions: { update, submit },
      meta: { inputRef: useRef(null) },
    }}>
      {children}
    </ComposerContext>
  )
}

Both work with the same <Composer.Input /> component.


Pattern 3: Explicit Variants

Create named components for each use case instead of boolean modes.

// BAD: What does this render?
<Composer
  isThread
  isEditing={false}
  channelId="abc"
  showAttachments
/>

// GOOD: Self-documenting
<ThreadComposer channelId="abc" />

Implementation:

function ThreadComposer({ channelId }: { channelId: string }) {
  return (
    <ThreadProvider channelId={channelId}>
      <Composer.Frame>
        <Composer.Input />
        <AlsoSendToChannelField channelId={channelId} />
        <Composer.Footer>
          <Composer.Formatting />
          <Composer.Submit />
        </Composer.Footer>
      </Composer.Frame>
    </ThreadProvider>
  )
}

function EditComposer({ messageId }: { messageId: string }) {
  return (
    <EditProvider messageId={messageId}>
      <Composer.Frame>
        <Composer.Input />
        <Composer.Footer>
          <Composer.CancelEdit />
          <Composer.SaveEdit />
        </Composer.Footer>
      </Composer.Frame>
    </EditProvider>
  )
}

Pattern 4: Lifted State

Components outside the visual hierarchy can access state via provider.

function ForwardMessageDialog() {
  return (
    <ForwardMessageProvider>
      <Dialog>
        {/* Composer UI */}
        <Composer.Frame>
          <Composer.Input placeholder="Add a message" />
          <Composer.Footer>
            <Composer.Formatting />
          </Composer.Footer>
        </Composer.Frame>

        {/* Preview OUTSIDE composer but reads its state */}
        <MessagePreview />

        {/* Actions OUTSIDE composer but can submit */}
        <DialogActions>
          <CancelButton />
          <ForwardButton />
        </DialogActions>
      </Dialog>
    </ForwardMessageProvider>
  )
}

// Can access context despite being outside Composer.Frame
function ForwardButton() {
  const { actions: { submit } } = use(ComposerContext)
  return <Button onPress={submit}>Forward</Button>
}

function MessagePreview() {
  const { state } = use(ComposerContext)
  return <Preview message={state.input} attachments={state.attachments} />
}

Key insight: Provider boundary matters, not visual nesting.


Pattern 5: Children Over Render Props

Use children for composition, render props only when passing data.

// BAD: Render props for structure
<Composer
  renderHeader={() => <CustomHeader />}
  renderFooter={() => <Formatting />}
  renderActions={() => <Submit />}
/>

// GOOD: Children for structure
<Composer.Frame>
  <CustomHeader />
  <Composer.Input />
  <Composer.Footer>
    <Formatting />
    <Submit />
  </Composer.Footer>
</Composer.Frame>

When render props ARE appropriate:

// Passing data to children
<List
  data={items}
  renderItem={({ item, index }) => <Item item={item} index={index} />}
/>

Pattern 6: Decouple State from UI

Only the provider knows how state is managed. UI consumes the interface.

// BAD: UI coupled to state implementation
function ChannelComposer({ channelId }) {
  const state = useGlobalChannelState(channelId)  // Knows about global state
  const { submit } = useChannelSync(channelId)    // Knows about sync
  
  return <Composer.Input value={state.input} onChange={...} />
}

// GOOD: State isolated in provider
function ChannelProvider({ channelId, children }) {
  const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId)
  
  return (
    <Composer.Provider
      state={state}
      actions={{ update, submit }}
      meta={{ inputRef: useRef(null) }}
    >
      {children}
    </Composer.Provider>
  )
}

// UI only knows the interface
function ChannelComposer() {
  return (
    <Composer.Frame>
      <Composer.Input />  {/* Works with any provider */}
      <Composer.Submit />
    </Composer.Frame>
  )
}

Quick Reference

Anti-PatternSolution
Boolean propsExplicit variant components
Render props for structureChildren composition
State in componentLift to provider
Coupled to state implGeneric context interface
Many conditional rendersCompose pieces explicitly

Files

  • rules/architecture-avoid-boolean-props.md - Detailed boolean prop guidance
  • rules/architecture-compound-components.md - Compound component pattern
  • rules/state-context-interface.md - Context interface design
  • rules/state-decouple-implementation.md - State isolation
  • rules/state-lift-state.md - Provider pattern
  • rules/patterns-explicit-variants.md - Variant components
  • rules/patterns-children-over-render-props.md - Composition over callbacks

NEVER

  • Add boolean props to customize behavior (use composition)
  • Create components with more than 2-3 boolean mode props
  • Couple UI components to specific state implementations
  • Use render props when children would work
  • Trap state inside components when siblings need access

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

yuqing-bitable-and-label

Incrementally sync data from XiaoAi API to Feishu Bitable and optionally auto-label records with machine-based type and sentiment annotations.

Registry SourceRecently Updated
General

张律师综合套装

张律师法律AI中台 - 中国首个开源法律AI技能库,涵盖刑事辩护、民商事诉讼、合同审查全流程

Registry SourceRecently Updated
General

刑事辩护

刑事辩护全流程AI助手 - 6大阶段21个模板,从接案到执行全覆盖

Registry SourceRecently Updated