literature-review

Conduct a systematic literature review on "$ARGUMENTS" using the paper and paper-search CLI tools.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "literature-review" with this command: npx skills add collaborative-deep-research/agent-papers-cli/collaborative-deep-research-agent-papers-cli-literature-review

Conduct a systematic literature review on "$ARGUMENTS" using the paper and paper-search CLI tools.

  1. Define Scope

Before searching, clarify with the user:

  • Topic boundaries and key terms

  • Year range (default: last 5 years)

  • Target venues or communities (if any)

  • Desired number of papers (default: 15-20 core papers)

  1. Multi-Query Search

Search with multiple query variations to maximize coverage:

paper-search semanticscholar papers "<main query>" --limit 20 --year <range> paper-search semanticscholar papers "<synonym query>" --limit 20 --year <range> paper-search semanticscholar papers "<related query>" --limit 20 --year <range> paper-search google scholar "<topic>"

Deduplicate results by title/paper ID.

  1. Triage

For each unique paper found:

paper-search semanticscholar details <paper_id> paper skim <arxiv_id> --lines 2

Categorize as: highly relevant / somewhat relevant / not relevant.

  1. Deep Analysis

For highly relevant papers:

paper outline <arxiv_id> paper read <arxiv_id> introduction paper read <arxiv_id> method paper read <arxiv_id> results paper read <arxiv_id> conclusion

Take structured notes on each paper: problem, method, key results, limitations.

  1. Citation Graph Exploration

For seminal papers, find related work:

paper-search semanticscholar citations <paper_id> --limit 20 paper-search semanticscholar references <paper_id> --limit 20

Add any important papers discovered this way back to the triage step.

  1. Produce Report

Organize findings by theme, not by paper. Include:

  • Overview of the field and its evolution

  • Key methods and approaches (with comparisons)

  • Main results and findings

  • Open questions and future directions

  • Complete reference list with paper IDs and URLs

  • BibTeX entries for all cited papers (use paper bibtex <arxiv_id> to generate)

Guidelines

  • Aim for breadth first: cover all major approaches before going deep on any one.

  • Note citation counts and venues to gauge paper impact.

  • Flag contradictory findings explicitly.

  • Distinguish between empirical results and theoretical claims.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.