pragmatic-guard

Enables and configures the Pragmatic Guard Mode to actively challenge over-engineering.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "pragmatic-guard" with this command: npx skills add codenamev/ai-software-architect/codenamev-ai-software-architect-pragmatic-guard

Pragmatic Guard Mode

Enables and configures the Pragmatic Guard Mode to actively challenge over-engineering.

Process

  1. Check Current Configuration
  • Read .architecture/config.yml to check current settings

  • If config.yml doesn't exist, offer to create it from .architecture/templates/config.yml

  • Check if pragmatic_mode.enabled is true

  • Note the intensity level (strict/balanced/lenient)

  • Review exemption categories and triggers

  1. Enable Pragmatic Mode (if requested)

If user wants to enable:

  • If config.yml doesn't exist: cp .architecture/templates/config.yml .architecture/config.yml

  • Set pragmatic_mode.enabled: true

  • Confirm intensity level with user or use default (balanced)

  • Create .architecture/deferrals.md from template if it doesn't exist: cp .architecture/templates/deferrals.md .architecture/deferrals.md

  • Inform user about mode activation and current settings

  1. Configure Intensity Level

Ask user which intensity they prefer if not specified:

Strict Mode:

  • Challenges aggressively, requires strong justification for any complexity

  • Questions every "should" and "could"

  • Pushes for absolute minimal implementation

  • Best for: New projects, MVPs, startups with limited resources

Balanced Mode (RECOMMENDED):

  • Challenges thoughtfully, accepts justified complexity

  • Seeks middle ground between simplicity and best practices

  • Questions "should" but accepts reasonable "must"

  • Best for: Most projects, growing teams, moderate complexity

Lenient Mode:

  • Raises concerns without blocking

  • Suggests simpler alternatives as options

  • Focuses on major complexity additions only

  • Best for: Established projects, teams with strong architecture practices

  1. Configure Triggers (optional)

Ask if user wants to customize which situations trigger pragmatic analysis:

  • New abstraction layers (interfaces, base classes, DI containers)

  • New external dependencies (libraries, frameworks, services)

  • New architectural patterns (repository, strategy, observer)

  • Scope expansion beyond initial requirements

  • Performance optimizations without evidence

  • Test infrastructure upfront

  • Flexibility/configurability additions

  1. Configure Exemptions (optional)

Confirm exemption categories where best practices should be maintained:

  • Security-critical features (always exempt by default)

  • Data integrity (always exempt by default)

  • Compliance requirements (always exempt by default)

  • Accessibility (always exempt by default)

  1. Understanding the Pragmatic Enforcer

Explain how the Pragmatic Enforcer will participate:

In Architecture Reviews:

  • Reviews each architect's recommendations

  • Applies necessity assessment (0-10 scoring)

  • Applies complexity assessment (0-10 scoring)

  • Proposes simpler alternatives

  • Calculates pragmatic score (complexity/necessity ratio, target <1.5)

In ADR Creation:

  • Challenges proposed decisions

  • Questions whether complexity is justified by current needs

  • Suggests phased approaches or deferrals

  • Documents trigger conditions for deferred decisions

Question Framework:

  • Necessity: "Do we need this right now?" "What breaks without it?"

  • Simplicity: "What's the simplest thing that could work?"

  • Cost: "What's the cost of implementing now vs waiting?"

  • Alternatives: "What if we just...?" "Could we use existing tools?"

  • Best Practices: "Does this best practice apply to our context?"

  1. Deferrals Tracking

If behavior.track_deferrals is true:

  • Maintain .architecture/deferrals.md with deferred decisions

  • Include trigger conditions for each deferral

  • Track when deferrals are implemented or remain deferred

  1. Report to User

Pragmatic Guard Mode: [Enabled | Disabled]

Configuration:

  • Intensity: [strict | balanced | lenient]
  • Apply to: [List of phases where it applies]
  • Deferrals tracking: [enabled | disabled]

Exemptions:

  • Security-critical: [enabled | disabled]
  • Data integrity: [enabled | disabled]
  • Compliance: [enabled | disabled]
  • Accessibility: [enabled | disabled]

Triggers: [List of active triggers]

The Pragmatic Enforcer will now:

  • Challenge recommendations from other architects
  • Question complexity and abstractions
  • Propose simpler alternatives
  • Calculate pragmatic scores (target ratio <1.5)
  • [If enabled] Track deferred decisions in .architecture/deferrals.md

Next Steps:

  • Create an ADR: "Create ADR for [topic]" (will include pragmatic analysis)
  • Start a review: "Start architecture review for [target]" (will include pragmatic challenges)
  • Adjust settings: Edit .architecture/config.yml

When to Use Pragmatic Mode

Enable for:

  • New projects or MVPs

  • Teams prone to over-engineering

  • Resource-constrained environments

  • Learning environments (teaching YAGNI)

  • Projects with tight deadlines

Consider disabling for:

  • Mature systems with established patterns

  • High-complexity domains requiring abstractions

  • Teams already practicing strong YAGNI principles

  • Projects with specific architectural requirements

Notes

  • Pragmatic mode is about finding balance, not blocking progress

  • The Pragmatic Enforcer's role is to question and challenge, not to veto

  • Intensity level should match team maturity and project complexity

  • Exemptions ensure critical areas maintain appropriate rigor

  • Deferrals can always be implemented when triggered by actual needs

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

architecture-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

create-adr

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

setup-architect

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review