social-content-creation

Social Content Creator

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "social-content-creation" with this command: npx skills add cdeistopened/skill-stack/cdeistopened-skill-stack-social-content-creation

Social Content Creator

Transform any source material into high-performing social media posts using the framework fitting method: extract standalone concepts, match to proven templates, generate volume, select best, execute, and proliferate winners.

Purpose

Content creation isn't about constantly coming up with new ideas. It's about turning 1 idea into 1000 variations using proven frameworks.

Core Philosophy: Good content follows proven formats. The skill is in framework fitting - matching concepts to the delivery mechanisms that amplify them best.

When to Use This Skill

  • Repurposing newsletter content into social posts

  • Transforming long-form articles into multi-platform campaigns

  • Creating LinkedIn posts from any concept or story

  • Generating multiple post options quickly

  • Multiplying high-performing posts using SCAMPER or desire reframing

Not for: Short-form video captions (use video-caption-creation ), podcast clip selection (separate workflow)

The Framework Fitting Method

Core Principle

Good content follows proven formats/frameworks/templates. The skill is in framework fitting - matching concepts to the delivery mechanisms that amplify them best.

Critical Rule: Avoid First-Match Bias

Do NOT default to the first template that seems to fit.

"Analyze, Then Select" - Treat template selection as a distinct step. Consider ALL applicable frameworks before selecting.

The best framework might not be the obvious one.

The 4-Phase Workflow

Phase 1: Extract Standalone Concepts

Goal: Identify the most shareable "standalone" concepts from source material

Step 1: Read Source Material Thoroughly

  • Full newsletter, article, or podcast transcript

  • Look for bundles of ideas within their context

  • Self-contained insights that can live independently

Step 2: Extract Concepts

For each standalone concept, capture:

  • Core Insight (1-2 sentences)

  • Context Needed (what background info is required?)

  • Emotion/Value (what does this unlock for the reader?)

  • Human Desire(s) (which of the 8 desires does this address?)

  • Potential Angles (initial framework ideas)

How Many Concepts to Extract:

  • Newsletter segment: 1-3 concepts per segment

  • Full newsletter: 5-10 concepts total

  • Long-form article: 5-15 concepts

  • Podcast episode: 3-8 concepts

Step 3: Create Concepts Document

[Source] - Extracted Concepts

Concept 1: [Title]

Core Insight: [1-2 sentences] Context: [What background is needed] Emotion/Value: [What this unlocks for reader] Human Desires: [Which of the 8] Potential Angles: [Framework ideas]


Concept 2: [Title]

[Repeat structure...]

The 8 Human Desires

Reference these when extracting concepts:

  • Safety of Tribe - Belonging, community, fitting in

  • Survival & Success - Progress, achievement, security

  • Life Enjoyment - Pleasure, experiences, freedom

  • Social Acceptance - Status, respect, recognition

  • Sexual Companionship - Connection, attraction (often not applicable)

  • Comfort & Clarity - Simplicity, ease, certainty

  • Freedom From Fear - Safety, protection, security

  • Perceived Status - Respect, authority, expertise

Phase 2: Framework Matching (THE CRITICAL PHASE)

Goal: Match extracted concepts to best-fit frameworks using volume generation → selection

The Framework Matching Process

For each concept:

Brainstorm First: How COULD this concept be presented?

  • Think beyond the obvious

  • Consider different platforms

  • Imagine different emotional angles

Review ALL Applicable Frameworks:

  • LinkedIn templates (86+ options)

  • Text post structures (100+ options)

  • Don't stop at first match

  • Consider at least 5-10 frameworks minimum

Test the Fit:

  • Does concept naturally fit framework structure?

  • What would make this concept fit BETTER in another framework?

  • Which framework amplifies the core emotion/value most?

Generate Volume:

  • Quick social plan: 2-4 framework matches per concept

  • High-volume campaign: 10-20 framework matches per concept

Select Best:

  • Which frameworks amplify the concept most?

  • Which platforms matter most?

  • Which formats are most efficient to execute?

Framework Categories

LinkedIn Templates (see references/linkedin-frameworks.md ):

  • 86+ templates from LinkedIn swipe files

  • 50+ templates from proven creators

  • Best for: Thought leadership, educational content, stories

Text Post Structures (see references/post-structures.md ):

  • 100+ proven tweet/post frameworks

  • Best for: X/Twitter, Facebook, Instagram captions

  • Categories: Comparisons, Lists, Challenges, Observations, Analogies

Document Framework Matches

Concept: "[Title]"

Framework Matches Generated (10 total):

1. Pattern Recognition Template

  • Fit Assessment: ✅ STRONG
  • Why it fits: [Explanation]
  • Structure: "I've noticed a pattern: [Common Belief] isn't what leads to [Success]... It's [Core Insight]"
  • Platform: LinkedIn
  • Execution Preview: "[Draft of how it would read]"

2. Contrarian Truth Template

  • Fit Assessment: ✅ STRONG / ⚠️ MODERATE / ❌ WEAK
  • Why it fits: [Explanation] [Continue...]

SELECTED FOR EXECUTION (Top 3):

  1. [Framework] - [Rationale]
  2. [Framework] - [Rationale]
  3. [Framework] - [Rationale]

Quality Check:

  • Generated at least 5-10 framework options per concept

  • Assessed fit strength (STRONG/MODERATE/WEAK)

  • Explained WHY concept fits each framework

  • Selected best 2-4 with clear rationale

  • Considered platform appropriateness

  • Avoided first-match bias

Phase 3: Execute Selected Frameworks

Goal: Create polished, platform-optimized posts from selected frameworks

Determine Output Scope

  • Quick Social Plan (1-3 posts): Best framework match per concept

  • Multi-Platform Campaign (5-10 posts): Multiple frameworks across concepts

  • High-Volume Repurposing (10-20 posts): 2-3 variations per framework

Execute Each Framework

  • Load Framework Structure - Reference the specific template

  • Fill with Concept Details - Insert insight, context, examples

  • Apply Voice - Match brand or individual voice style

  • Platform-Specific Optimization - Apply rules below

  • Generate Variations - Create 1-3 variations of same framework

Platform-Specific Guidelines

LinkedIn:

  • Length: Long-form value-dense posts outperform (200-500 words)

  • Links: Always in comments (not main post)

  • Hashtags: 3-5 maximum, minimal

  • Voice: Professional yet conversational, thought leadership

  • Hook: First 2 lines critical (shows before "see more")

  • Structure: Hook → Body → Insight → Question or CTA

  • Tagging: Tag mentioned people/orgs (increases reach)

X (Twitter):

  • Length: 70-100 characters optimal (despite 280 limit)

  • Hashtags: 1-2 maximum

  • Voice: Witty, concise, to-the-point

  • Threads: Use for longer concepts

  • Current strategy: Reply game important for growth

Facebook:

  • Length: 40-140 characters optimal

  • Links: NO external links in main post (kills reach)

  • Hashtags: NO hashtags (Facebook doesn't reward them)

  • Voice: Informal, playful, personable

  • Format: Question posts with images perform best

Instagram:

  • Length: 30-125 characters for feed captions

  • Hashtags: 5-10 relevant hashtags

  • Voice: Friendly, authentic, micro-story format

  • Formats: Reels outperform static, carousels for educational

Post Output Format

POST 1: [Framework Name]

[Full post text]


Framework: [Template used] Voice: [Brand/Individual] Word Count: [Number] Hashtags: [If applicable] Platform: [Target platform] Link in Comments: [URL if applicable] Tags: [People/orgs to tag]

Quality Check

Voice Consistency:

  • Sounds like a real person, not corporate

  • Would I say this to a friend?

  • Respects reader intelligence

Platform Compliance:

  • Adheres to character limits

  • Hashtags appropriate for platform

  • Links placed correctly

Framework Fidelity:

  • Actually follows selected framework structure

  • Doesn't drift into generic post

  • Template name documented

Strategic Alignment:

  • Would target audience stop scrolling?

  • Creates curiosity/emotion/value in first 2 seconds?

  • Clear what action reader should take?

Phase 4: Proliferate Winners (OPTIONAL)

Goal: Multiply high-performing posts using SCAMPER, Human Desires, and Vision reframing

When to use:

  • Monthly: Study top performers and multiply them

  • Pre-posting: Generate many options, select best

  • Content drought: Multiply existing winners

Method 1: SCAMPER Variations

Generate 7 variations from one post (one per letter):

S - Substitute

  • Replace main idea with adjacent concept

  • Swap the method for accomplishing benefit

  • Change examples while keeping structure

C - Combine

  • Merge with personal experience or story

  • Combine two concepts for more power

  • Add reply to someone else's post as your own content

A - Adapt

  • Expand one-liner into full post or thread

  • Add "missing piece" not in original

  • Adapt to different platform

M - Modify

  • Magnify specific pain points

  • Use same idea in different format

  • Make more punchy by removing words

P - Purpose (Put to other use)

  • Angle for different audience segment

  • Different benefit/pain point this solves

E - Eliminate

  • Remove words to make punchier

  • Simplify complex explanation

  • Cut nuance and uncertainty

R - Reverse

  • Flip the idea completely

  • "With X you get Y" → "Without X you stay stuck with Z"

  • Positive framing → negative (or vice versa)

SCAMPER Example:

Original:

"The most successful founders don't start with funding. They start with customers."

S - Substitute:

"The most successful founders don't start with a perfect product. They start with a painful problem."

C - Combine:

"I spent years thinking I needed funding to start. Then I talked to 3 founders who bootstrapped to $10M. The most successful don't start with funding. They start with customers."

R - Reverse:

"Without customers, your funding means nothing. Ask any startup that raised $50M and still failed."

Method 2: Human Desires Reframing

Spin concept through 8 desire lenses:

Example concept: "Customers over funding"

Safety of Tribe:

"You don't need VCs to validate your idea. You need customers who get it. Build your tribe first."

Survival & Success:

"The path to success isn't through investors. Every successful founder knows: customers first, funding later."

Comfort & Clarity:

"Starting a company feels overwhelming. Here's what brings clarity: successful founders don't start with funding. They start with customers. Everything else follows."

Freedom From Fear:

"The fear of 'not having enough runway' stops more companies than lack of funding. Get customers first. The fear disappears."

Proliferation Output

Create file: [Post Title]_Proliferations.md

Include:

  • 7 SCAMPER variations

  • 6-8 Human Desire reframes

  • Total: 13-15 new variations from 1 original

Output Files & Organization

Standard Output Structure

[Working Folder]/ ├── [Source]_Concepts.md # Phase 1 ├── [Source]_Framework_Matches.md # Phase 2 ├── [Source]_Social_Posts.md # Phase 3 └── [Winner]_Proliferations.md # Phase 4 (optional)

Alternate: Combined Output

[Source] - Social Content

Concept 1: [Name]

[Concept details]

Framework Matches

[2-4 options with fit assessment]

Selected Posts

[Executed posts ready to publish]


Concept 2: [Name]

[Repeat...]

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Content Issues

❌ First-Match Bias - Picking first framework that fits ❌ Generic Posts - Not using any framework ❌ Too Many Concepts - Multiple ideas in one post ❌ Missing Context - Concept doesn't stand alone

Framework Issues

❌ Framework Drift - Abandoning structure mid-post ❌ Mismatched Fit - Forcing concept into wrong framework ❌ No Volume - Creating only 1 option instead of 5-10+

Platform Issues

❌ Wrong Link Placement - External links in Facebook/LinkedIn main posts ❌ Hashtag Overload - Too many for platform ❌ Voice Mismatch - Too formal for Facebook, too casual for LinkedIn

Process Issues

❌ Skipping Concept Extraction - Writing without identifying standalone concepts ❌ Not Documenting Framework - Can't reference what worked later

Success Metrics

A successful social post:

✅ Follows proven framework - Has clear structure ✅ Stops the scroll - Hook creates curiosity/emotion ✅ Standalone value - Works without reading source ✅ Platform-optimized - Follows rules for hashtags, links, length ✅ Framework documented - Template name noted ✅ Shareable - Audience would forward/tag others ✅ Authentic voice - Sounds like real person

Bundled Resources

Template Libraries

  • references/linkedin-frameworks.md

  • 136 LinkedIn templates

  • references/post-structures.md

  • 100+ text post frameworks

Proliferation Methods

  • references/scamper-guide.md

  • SCAMPER method with examples

  • references/human-desires-guide.md

  • 8 desires with reframing examples

Platform Guidelines

  • references/platform-guidelines.md
  • Detailed platform rules

Related Skills

  • hook-and-headline-writing - Optimize post hooks

  • anti-ai-writing - Humanize posts that sound too polished

  • voice-[style] - Match posts to specific brand voice

  • transcript-polisher - Clean source transcripts first

Content creation is framework fitting. Extract concepts, match to templates, generate volume, select best. Turn 1 idea into 1000 variations.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

anti-ai-writing

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

ghostwriter

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

transcript-polisher

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

hook-and-headline-writing

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review