workflow-multi-cli-plan

Multi-CLI Collaborative Planning

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "workflow-multi-cli-plan" with this command: npx skills add catlog22/claude-code-workflow/catlog22-claude-code-workflow-workflow-multi-cli-plan

Multi-CLI Collaborative Planning

Auto Mode

When workflowPreferences.autoYes is true: Auto-approve plan, use recommended solution and execution method (Agent, Skip review).

Context Source: ACE semantic search + Multi-CLI analysis Output Directory: .workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/

Default Max Rounds: 3 (convergence may complete earlier) CLI Tools: @cli-discuss-agent (analysis), @cli-lite-planning-agent (plan generation) Execution: Auto-hands off to workflow-lite-execute after plan approval

Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)

  • ONLY command for multi-CLI collaborative planning

  • Manages: Session state, user decisions, agent delegation, phase transitions

  • Delegates: CLI execution to @cli-discuss-agent, plan generation to @cli-lite-planning-agent

Execution Flow

Phase 1: Context Gathering └─ ACE semantic search, extract keywords, build context package

Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion (Iterative, via @cli-discuss-agent) ├─ Round N: Agent executes Gemini + Codex + Claude ├─ Cross-verify findings, synthesize solutions ├─ Write synthesis.json to rounds/{N}/ └─ Loop until convergence or max rounds

Phase 3: Present Options └─ Display solutions with trade-offs from agent output

Phase 4: User Decision ├─ Select solution approach ├─ Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto) ├─ Select code review tool (Skip/Gemini/Codex/Agent) └─ Route: ├─ Approve → Phase 5 ├─ Need More Analysis → Return to Phase 2 └─ Cancel → Save session

Phase 5: Plan Generation & Execution Handoff ├─ Generate plan.json + .task/*.json (via @cli-lite-planning-agent, two-layer output) ├─ Build executionContext with user selections and taskFiles └─ Execute via workflow-lite-execute

Agent Roles

Agent Responsibility

Orchestrator Session management, ACE context, user decisions, phase transitions, executionContext assembly

@cli-discuss-agent Multi-CLI execution (Gemini/Codex/Claude), cross-verification, solution synthesis, synthesis.json output

@cli-lite-planning-agent Task decomposition, two-layer output: plan.json (overview with task_ids[]) + .task/*.json (task files)

Core Responsibilities

Phase 1: Context Gathering

Session Initialization:

const sessionId = MCP-${taskSlug}-${date} const sessionFolder = .workflow/.multi-cli-plan/${sessionId} Bash(mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/rounds)

ACE Context Queries:

const aceQueries = [ Project architecture related to ${keywords}, Existing implementations of ${keywords[0]}, Code patterns for ${keywords} features, Integration points for ${keywords[0]} ] // Execute via mcp__ace-tool__search_context

Context Package (passed to agent):

  • relevant_files[]

  • Files identified by ACE

  • detected_patterns[]

  • Code patterns found

  • architecture_insights

  • Structure understanding

Phase 2: Agent Delegation

Core Principle: Orchestrator only delegates and reads output — NO direct CLI execution. CLI calls MUST use Bash with run_in_background: true , wait for hook callback, do NOT use TaskOutput polling.

Agent Invocation:

Agent({ subagent_type: "cli-discuss-agent", run_in_background: false, description: Discussion round ${currentRound}, prompt: `

Input Context

  • task_description: ${taskDescription}
  • round_number: ${currentRound}
  • session: { id: "${sessionId}", folder: "${sessionFolder}" }
  • ace_context: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackage)}
  • previous_rounds: ${JSON.stringify(analysisResults)}
  • user_feedback: ${userFeedback || 'None'}
  • cli_config: { tools: ["gemini", "codex"], mode: "parallel", fallback_chain: ["gemini", "codex", "claude"] }

Execution Process

  1. Parse input context (handle JSON strings)
  2. Check if ACE supplementary search needed
  3. Build CLI prompts with context
  4. Execute CLIs (parallel or serial per cli_config.mode)
  5. Parse CLI outputs, handle failures with fallback
  6. Perform cross-verification between CLI results
  7. Synthesize solutions, calculate scores
  8. Calculate convergence, generate clarification questions
  9. Write synthesis.json

Output

Write: ${sessionFolder}/rounds/${currentRound}/synthesis.json

Completion Checklist

  • All configured CLI tools executed (or fallback triggered)
  • Cross-verification completed with agreements/disagreements
  • 2-3 solutions generated with file:line references
  • Convergence score calculated (0.0-1.0)
  • synthesis.json written with all Primary Fields ` })

Read Agent Output:

const synthesis = JSON.parse(Read(${sessionFolder}/rounds/${round}/synthesis.json)) // Access top-level fields: solutions, convergence, cross_verification, clarification_questions

Convergence Decision:

if (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'converged') { // Proceed to Phase 3 } else if (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'user_input_needed') { // Collect user feedback, return to Phase 2 } else { // Continue to next round if new_insights && round < maxRounds }

Phase 3: Present Options

Display solutions from synthesis.solutions[] showing: name, source CLIs, effort/risk, pros/cons, affected files (file:line ). Also show cross-verification agreements/disagreements count.

Phase 4: User Decision

AskUserQuestion({ questions: [ { question: "Which solution approach?", header: "Solution", multiSelect: false, options: solutions.map((s, i) => ({ label: Option ${i+1}: ${s.name}, description: ${s.effort} effort, ${s.risk} risk })).concat([ { label: "Need More Analysis", description: "Return to Phase 2" } ]) }, { question: "Execution method:", header: "Execution", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" }, { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" }, { label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" } ] }, { question: "Code review after execution?", header: "Review", multiSelect: false, options: [ { label: "Skip", description: "No review" }, { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI tool" }, { label: "Codex Review", description: "codex review --uncommitted" }, { label: "Agent Review", description: "Current agent review" } ] } ] })

Routing:

  • Approve + execution method → Phase 5

  • Need More Analysis → Phase 2 with feedback

  • Cancel → Save session for resumption

TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 Decision):

const executionLabel = userSelection.execution_method // "Agent" / "Codex" / "Auto"

TodoWrite({ todos: [ { content: "Phase 1: Context Gathering", status: "completed", activeForm: "Gathering context" }, { content: "Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion", status: "completed", activeForm: "Running discussion" }, { content: "Phase 3: Present Options", status: "completed", activeForm: "Presenting options" }, { content: Phase 4: User Decision [${executionLabel}], status: "completed", activeForm: "Decision recorded" }, { content: Phase 5: Plan Generation [${executionLabel}], status: "in_progress", activeForm: Generating plan [${executionLabel}] } ]})

Phase 5: Plan Generation & Execution Handoff

Step 1: Build Context-Package (Orchestrator responsibility):

const contextPackage = { solution: { name: selectedSolution.name, source_cli: selectedSolution.source_cli, feasibility: selectedSolution.feasibility, effort: selectedSolution.effort, risk: selectedSolution.risk, summary: selectedSolution.summary }, implementation_plan: selectedSolution.implementation_plan, dependencies: selectedSolution.dependencies || { internal: [], external: [] }, technical_concerns: selectedSolution.technical_concerns || [], consensus: { agreements: synthesis.cross_verification.agreements, resolved_conflicts: synthesis.cross_verification.resolution }, constraints: userConstraints || [], task_description: taskDescription, session_id: sessionId } Write(${sessionFolder}/context-package.json, JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2))

Step 2: Invoke Planning Agent:

Agent({ subagent_type: "cli-lite-planning-agent", run_in_background: false, description: "Generate implementation plan", prompt: `

Schema Reference

Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-overview-base-schema.json Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/task-schema.json

Output Format: Two-Layer Structure

  • plan.json: Overview with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files (NO tasks[] array)
  • .task/TASK-*.json: Independent task files following task-schema.json

plan.json required: summary, approach, task_ids, task_count, _metadata (with plan_type) Task files required: id, title, description, depends_on, convergence (with criteria[]) Task fields: files[].change (not modification_points), convergence.criteria (not acceptance), test (not verification)

Context-Package (from orchestrator)

${JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2)}

Execution Process

  1. Read plan-overview-base-schema.json + task-schema.json for output structure
  2. Read project-tech.json and specs/*.md
  3. Parse context-package fields:
    • solution: name, feasibility, summary
    • implementation_plan: tasks[], execution_flow, milestones
    • dependencies: internal[], external[]
    • technical_concerns: risks/blockers
    • consensus: agreements, resolved_conflicts
    • constraints: user requirements
  4. Use implementation_plan.tasks[] as task foundation
  5. Preserve task dependencies (depends_on) and execution_flow
  6. Expand tasks with convergence.criteria (testable completion conditions)
  7. Create .task/ directory and write individual TASK-*.json files
  8. Generate plan.json with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files

Output

  • ${sessionFolder}/plan.json (overview with task_ids[])
  • ${sessionFolder}/.task/TASK-*.json (independent task files)

Completion Checklist

  • plan.json has task_ids[] and task_count (NO embedded tasks[])
  • .task/*.json files preserve task dependencies from implementation_plan
  • Task execution order follows execution_flow
  • Key_points reflected in task descriptions
  • User constraints applied to implementation
  • convergence.criteria are testable
  • plan.json follows plan-overview-base-schema.json
  • Task files follow task-schema.json ` })

Step 3: Build executionContext:

const plan = JSON.parse(Read(${sessionFolder}/plan.json)) const taskFiles = plan.task_ids.map(id => ${sessionFolder}/.task/${id}.json)

// Build executionContext (same structure as lite-plan) executionContext = { planObject: plan, taskFiles: taskFiles, // Paths to .task/*.json files (two-layer format) explorationsContext: null, // Multi-CLI doesn't use exploration files explorationAngles: [], explorationManifest: null, clarificationContext: null, // Store user feedback from Phase 2 if exists executionMethod: userSelection.execution_method, // From Phase 4 codeReviewTool: userSelection.code_review_tool, // From Phase 4 originalUserInput: taskDescription, executorAssignments: null, session: { id: sessionId, folder: sessionFolder, artifacts: { explorations: [], // No explorations in multi-CLI workflow explorations_manifest: null, plan: ${sessionFolder}/plan.json, task_dir: plan.task_ids ? ${sessionFolder}/.task/ : null, synthesis_rounds: Array.from({length: currentRound}, (_, i) => ${sessionFolder}/rounds/${i+1}/synthesis.json ), context_package: ${sessionFolder}/context-package.json } } }

Step 4: Hand off to Execution:

Skill({ skill: "workflow-lite-execute", args: "--in-memory" }) // executionContext is passed via global variable to workflow-lite-execute (Mode 1: In-Memory Plan)

synthesis.json Schema

{ "round": 1, "solutions": [{ "name": "Solution Name", "source_cli": ["gemini", "codex"], "feasibility": 0.85, "effort": "low|medium|high", "risk": "low|medium|high", "summary": "Brief analysis summary", "implementation_plan": { "approach": "High-level technical approach", "tasks": [ {"id": "T1", "name": "Task", "depends_on": [], "files": [], "key_point": "..."} ], "execution_flow": "T1 → T2 → T3", "milestones": ["Checkpoint 1", "Checkpoint 2"] }, "dependencies": {"internal": [], "external": []}, "technical_concerns": ["Risk 1", "Blocker 2"] }], "convergence": { "score": 0.85, "new_insights": false, "recommendation": "converged|continue|user_input_needed" }, "cross_verification": { "agreements": [], "disagreements": [], "resolution": "..." }, "clarification_questions": [] }

TodoWrite Pattern

Initialization (Phase 1 start):

TodoWrite({ todos: [ { content: "Phase 1: Context Gathering", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Gathering context" }, { content: "Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Running discussion" }, { content: "Phase 3: Present Options", status: "pending", activeForm: "Presenting options" }, { content: "Phase 4: User Decision", status: "pending", activeForm: "Awaiting decision" }, { content: "Phase 5: Plan Generation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Generating plan" } ]})

Output File Structure

.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{MCP-task-slug-YYYY-MM-DD}/ ├── session-state.json # Session tracking (orchestrator) ├── rounds/ │ ├── 1/synthesis.json # Round 1 analysis (cli-discuss-agent) │ ├── 2/synthesis.json # Round 2 analysis (cli-discuss-agent) │ └── .../ ├── context-package.json # Extracted context for planning (orchestrator) ├── plan.json # Plan overview with task_ids[] (NO embedded tasks[]) └── .task/ # Independent task files ├── TASK-001.json # Task file following task-schema.json ├── TASK-002.json └── ...

Error Handling

Error Resolution

ACE search fails Fall back to Glob/Grep for file discovery

Agent fails Retry once, then present partial results

CLI timeout (in agent) Agent uses fallback: gemini → codex → claude

No convergence Present best options, flag uncertainty

synthesis.json parse error Request agent retry

User cancels Save session for later resumption

Configuration

Flag Default Description

--max-rounds

3 Maximum discussion rounds

--tools

gemini,codex CLI tools for analysis

--mode

parallel Execution mode: parallel or serial

--auto-execute

false Auto-execute after approval

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

skill-generator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

review-code

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

ccw-help

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review