next

Next Action Assessment

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "next" with this command: npx skills add braselog/researchassistant/braselog-researchassistant-next

Next Action Assessment

The intelligent dispatcher that knows your full toolkit and recommends the right action at the right time.

When to Use

  • Starting a work session

  • Feeling stuck or unsure what to do next

  • After completing a task

  • Want AI to assess project state and priorities

Skill Registry

By Research Phase

Phase Primary Skills Supporting Skills

SETUP

review-script

PLANNING hypothesis-generation , literature-review , deep-research

note , task

DEVELOPMENT review-script , statistical-analysis

note , task

ANALYSIS exploratory-data-analysis , statistical-analysis , scientific-visualization

note , task

WRITING write-background , write-methods , write-results , scientific-writing

literature-review

REVIEW peer-review , review-script

scientific-writing

By Detected Condition

Condition Recommended Skill Trigger

New data file in data/

exploratory-data-analysis

Unanalyzed data files detected

Empty background.md

literature-review or write-background

No background content

Empty methods.md

write-methods

Scripts exist but no methods doc

Figures without results text write-results

Figures in manuscript/figures/ not in results.md

New audio in meetings/

transcribe → summarize-meeting

Audio without transcript

Scripts without docstrings review-script

Undocumented code

No hypothesis documented hypothesis-generation

PLANNING phase, no hypothesis in project_telos.md

Data quality issues noted statistical-analysis

After EDA identifies issues

Ready for figures scientific-visualization

Analysis complete, no pub-quality figures

Draft complete peer-review

All manuscript sections have content

Monday detected plan-week

Start of work week

Friday/End of day wrap-up

End of work session

Week boundary weekly-review

7+ days since last weekly review

Month boundary monthly-review

30+ days since last monthly review

Execution Steps

  1. Load Context (REQUIRED)

Read these files to understand current state:

~/.researchAssistant/researcher_telos.md (user profile) .research/project_telos.md (project state, current phase) .research/phase_checklist.md (what's done/remaining) .research/logs/activity.md (recent activity) tasks.md (pending tasks)

Extract:

  • Current phase: SETUP | PLANNING | DEVELOPMENT | ANALYSIS | WRITING | REVIEW

  • Recent activity: What did they work on last?

  • Pending tasks: What's marked as TODO or in-progress?

  • Blockers: Any noted blockers or uncertainties?

  1. First-Time Setup Check

Check for researcher profile:

IF ~/.researchAssistant/researcher_telos.md does NOT exist:

  • Move ./researcher_telos_template.md to ~/.researchAssistant/researcher_telos.md
  • Ask onboarding questions to populate it
  • Create ~/.researchAssistant/ directory if needed ELSE:
  • Delete ./researcher_telos_template.md if it still exists
  • Load preferences from existing profile

Check for project setup:

IF .research/project_telos.md is mostly empty (mission not defined):

  • Start project onboarding flow
  • Ask: "What's this project about in 1-2 sentences?"
  • Ask: "Is this part of a larger grant?"
  • Ask: "What's your target output?"
  1. Scan for Conditions

Check each condition in order of priority:

Critical (Check First)

  • Phase gate violations: e.g., trying DEVELOPMENT with empty background

  • First-time setup needed: Profile or project not configured

High Priority

  • Uncommitted git changes > 3 days old

  • New data files not yet explored (→ exploratory-data-analysis )

  • New meeting recordings (→ transcribe )

  • High-priority tasks in tasks.md

  • Stale activity (>7 days since last log)

Medium Priority

  • Scripts without documentation (→ review-script )

  • Figures without captions (→ scientific-visualization )

  • Weekly review due (→ weekly-review )

  • Empty manuscript sections appropriate to current phase

Low Priority

  • Monday morning (→ plan-week )

  • Orphan files or incomplete sections

  • End of day (→ wrap-up )

  1. Consider Phase-Appropriate Skills

Based on current phase, identify which skills are most relevant:

PLANNING Phase Priorities:

  • hypothesis-generation

  • Do you have a clear hypothesis?

  • literature-review / deep-research

  • Have you surveyed the field?

  • write-background

  • Can you articulate the problem?

DEVELOPMENT Phase Priorities:

  • review-script

  • Document as you build

  • statistical-analysis

  • Plan your analysis approach

ANALYSIS Phase Priorities:

  • exploratory-data-analysis

  • Understand your data first

  • statistical-analysis

  • Formal testing

  • scientific-visualization

  • Publication figures

WRITING Phase Priorities:

  • write-methods

  • Document what you did

  • write-results

  • Describe what you found

  • scientific-writing

  • Polish and format

REVIEW Phase Priorities:

  • peer-review

  • Self-assessment

  • review-script

  • Code quality check

  • Final scientific-writing pass

  1. Generate Recommendations

Present 2-4 options ranked by value:

🎯 Recommended Next Steps

Based on your project state (Phase: ANALYSIS, Last active: 2 days ago):

A) [High Priority] Explore your new dataset

I noticed data/raw/experiment_results.csv was added recently. → Run /exploratory_data_analysis data/raw/experiment_results.csv

This will help you:

  • Understand data structure and quality
  • Identify any issues before formal analysis
  • Generate summary statistics

B) [Medium Priority] Document your preprocessing script

scripts/preprocess.py lacks docstrings. → Run /review_script scripts/preprocess.py

Good documentation now saves time during methods writing.

C) [Routine] Weekly review

Last weekly review was 8 days ago. → Run /weekly_review

D) [Continue] Resume from last session

You were working on: "correlation analysis for Figure 2" → Continue where you left off


Quick actions: /note | /task | /wrap_up

What would you like to focus on?

Priority indicators:

  • 🔴 Critical - Blocking progress

  • 🟡 High priority - Should do soon

  • 🔵 Recommended - Good practice

  • ⚪ Optional - Nice to have

Skill Quick Reference

For user awareness, here's the full toolkit organized by purpose:

📊 Data & Analysis

Skill Command Use When

Exploratory Data Analysis /exploratory_data_analysis [file]

First look at any dataset

Statistical Analysis /statistical_analysis

Formal hypothesis testing

Scientific Visualization /scientific_visualization

Publication-quality figures

📚 Literature & Research

Skill Command Use When

Literature Review /literature_review [topic]

Systematic literature search

Deep Research /deep_research [topic]

Quick literature lookup

Hypothesis Generation /hypothesis_generation

Formulating research questions

✍️ Writing & Documentation

Skill Command Use When

Write Background /write_background

Draft introduction/background

Write Methods /write_methods

Document methodology

Write Results /write_results

Describe findings

Scientific Writing /scientific_writing

Polish any section

🔍 Review & Quality

Skill Command Use When

Peer Review /peer_review

Self-assess before submission

Review Script /review_script [path]

Code quality check

📅 Planning & Tracking

Skill Command Use When

Plan Week /plan_week

Monday planning session

Weekly Review /weekly_review

End of week reflection

Monthly Review /monthly_review

Monthly alignment check

Quarterly Review /quarterly_review

Research mission review

Wrap Up /wrap_up

End of work session

⚡ Quick Capture

Skill Command Use When

Note /note [text]

Quick thought capture

Task /task [text]

Add a todo item

Transcribe /transcribe [file]

Convert audio to text

Summarize Meeting /summarize_meeting [file]

Extract action items

Example Outputs by Phase

PLANNING Phase /next

You're in the PLANNING phase. Key priorities:

A) 🟡 Generate your hypothesis Your project_telos.md has aims but no formal hypothesis. → Run /hypothesis_generation

B) 🟡 Literature review on [detected topic] Background.md is empty. Let's build your foundation. → Run /literature_review [topic]

C) ⚪ Quick win - capture your current thinking → Run /note to log where your head is at

ANALYSIS Phase /next

You're in the ANALYSIS phase with new data. Priorities:

A) 🔴 Explore experiment_results.csv New data file detected - understand it before analyzing. → Run /exploratory_data_analysis data/raw/experiment_results.csv

B) 🟡 After EDA: Statistical analysis Once you understand the data, run formal tests. → Run /statistical_analysis

C) 🔵 Parallel: Document your analysis scripts preprocess.py and analyze.py need docstrings. → Run /review_script scripts/preprocess.py

WRITING Phase /next

You're in the WRITING phase. Current status:

  • ✅ Background: Draft complete
  • ⚠️ Methods: Partially written
  • ❌ Results: Empty (but you have 3 figures!)

A) 🔴 Write your results section You have figures ready but no results text. → Run /write_results

B) 🟡 Complete methods documentation → Run /write_methods

C) 🔵 Scientific writing review → Run /scientific_writing on completed sections

Response Format

Always structure /next responses as:

  • Context summary (1-2 lines: phase, last activity, any alerts)

  • Prioritized options (A/B/C/D format with clear commands)

  • Quick actions footer (remind of /note, /task, /wrap_up)

  • Invitation to choose or explain their own priority

Notes

  • Always be encouraging, never judgmental

  • If user seems stuck, offer to break down the next step

  • Remember: user may not know what commands exist - suggest them explicitly

  • Update activity.md after significant interactions

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Research

scientific-writing

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

deep-research

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

statistical-analysis

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Research

weekly-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review