summarize-meeting

Meeting Summary Expert

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "summarize-meeting" with this command: npx skills add borghei/claude-skills/borghei-claude-skills-summarize-meeting

Meeting Summary Expert

Overview

Transform meeting notes, transcripts, or recordings into clear, actionable summaries. Every summary follows a consistent structure that makes it easy for attendees and non-attendees alike to understand what was discussed, what was decided, and who is doing what by when.

When to Use

  • After any meeting where decisions were made or actions were assigned.

  • Sprint ceremonies -- planning, retro, backlog refinement, sprint review.

  • Stakeholder meetings -- steering committees, executive reviews, client calls.

  • Ad-hoc discussions -- when an impromptu conversation produces commitments that need tracking.

Methodology

Step 1: Capture Meeting Metadata

Record the essential context:

Field Description

Date Meeting date (YYYY-MM-DD)

Time Start and end time with timezone

Participants Names and roles (e.g., "Sarah Chen, Product Lead")

Topic One-line meeting purpose

Location Room name, video link, or "async"

Step 2: Extract Key Discussion Points

From the raw notes or transcript, identify the substantive topics discussed. Guidelines:

  • Summarize, do not transcribe. Capture the essence of each topic in 1-3 bullet points.

  • Use plain language. Avoid jargon. Anyone reading the summary should understand the points without having attended.

  • Focus on what matters. Skip small talk, repeated points, and tangential discussions.

  • Note disagreements. If there was significant debate, capture the key positions and how they were resolved (or not).

Step 3: Extract Action Items

Every action item must answer three questions:

  • Who is responsible? (Single owner, not a team)

  • What specifically must they do? (Concrete, observable deliverable)

  • By when? (Specific date, not "soon" or "next sprint")

Format as a table:

Due Date Owner Action

2026-03-10 Sarah Chen Share revised wireframes with the design team

2026-03-07 James Park Schedule load test for the staging environment

Action item quality checks:

  • Each action has exactly one owner (not "Sarah and James")

  • The deliverable is specific enough to verify completion

  • The due date is a calendar date, not a relative timeframe

  • Actions use active verbs: "share," "schedule," "draft," "review," "decide"

Step 4: Record Decisions

List each decision made during the meeting as a numbered item. Include enough context that someone who was not present understands the decision and its rationale.

Format:

  • [Decision] -- [Brief rationale or context]. Decided by [who].

  • [Decision] -- [Brief rationale or context]. Decided by [who].

Examples:

  • Launch date set for April 15 -- Allows two full sprints for QA after feature freeze on March 28. Decided by steering committee.

  • Use PostgreSQL instead of MongoDB for the analytics service -- Team consensus based on query pattern analysis showing 80% relational queries. Decided by engineering leads.

Step 5: Capture Open Questions

List unresolved questions that need follow-up. For each question, note who is expected to provide an answer and by when, if known.

  • Do we need a separate staging environment for the new analytics service? (James to investigate by March 10)

  • What is the budget ceiling for the Q2 marketing campaign? (Pending finance review)

Step 6: Save and Distribute

File naming convention: Meeting-Summary-[YYYY-MM-DD]-[topic-slug].md

Examples:

  • Meeting-Summary-2026-03-04-sprint-planning.md

  • Meeting-Summary-2026-03-04-q2-roadmap-review.md

Distribution:

  • Share the summary within 24 hours of the meeting.

  • Send to all participants and relevant stakeholders who were not present.

  • Store in the team's shared documentation space (Confluence, Notion, shared drive).

Output Template

Meeting Summary

Metadata

FieldValue
Date[YYYY-MM-DD]
Time[HH:MM] - [HH:MM] [TZ]
Participants[Name, Role]; [Name, Role]; ...
Topic[One-line meeting purpose]

Summary

  • [Key discussion point 1]
  • [Key discussion point 2]
  • [Key discussion point 3]

Action Items

Due DateOwnerAction
[YYYY-MM-DD][Name][Specific, verifiable action]

Decisions Made

  1. [Decision] -- [Rationale]. Decided by [who].

Open Questions

  1. [Question]? ([Who is expected to answer, by when])

What to Focus On

When summarizing, prioritize:

  • Decisions that affect roadmap or strategy -- These have the broadest impact and are most likely to be referenced later.

  • Who does what by when -- Accountability is the primary value of a meeting summary.

  • Blockers and risks surfaced -- These need visibility beyond the meeting room.

  • Changes to previously agreed plans -- These create confusion if not documented.

When summarizing, deprioritize:

  • Status updates that are available elsewhere (Jira, dashboards)

  • Repetition of information already documented

  • Social conversation and small talk

  • Detailed technical discussions better captured in design docs

Integration with Other Skills

  • Feed decisions into wwas/ to create backlog items with strategic context.

  • Use action items to create tickets via ../jira-expert/ .

  • Document recurring meeting outcomes in ../confluence-expert/ templates.

References

  • See references/meeting-facilitation-guide.md for meeting types, note-taking strategies, and anti-patterns.

  • See assets/meeting_summary_template.md for ready-to-use templates.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

product-designer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
2.2K-borghei
General

business-intelligence

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

brand-strategist

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

senior-mobile

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review