analyzing-git-sessions

Analyzing Git Sessions

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "analyzing-git-sessions" with this command: npx skills add bitwarden/ai-plugins/bitwarden-ai-plugins-analyzing-git-sessions

Analyzing Git Sessions

Core Responsibility

Generate structured analysis of git activity for specified timeframe or commit range, including commit history, file changes, statistics, and optional diffs.

Inputs

Accept from user:

  • Time range: "last 2 hours", "since 10am", "today", "since 2025-10-23 14:00"

  • Commit range: "abc123..def456", "HEAD~5..HEAD", "feature-branch..main"

  • Optional filters: Specific paths, authors, or file types

  • Output depth: Concise (default), Detailed, or Code Review format

Working Process

Step 1: Parse and Validate Input

Determine range type:

  • Time-based: Parse relative or absolute time

  • Commit-based: Validate commit references exist

  • Branch-based: Resolve branch names to commits

Validate git repository:

git rev-parse --git-dir

Check range has commits:

git log <range> --oneline | head -1

If empty, inform user and exit.

Step 2: Extract Commit History

Get all commits in range

git log <range> --oneline --no-decorate

Get detailed commit info

git log <range> --format="%h|%an|%ar|%s" --no-decorate

Count commits

git log <range> --oneline | wc -l

Store commit data for summary.

Step 3: Generate Statistics

Overall change statistics:

Summary stats (insertions/deletions by file)

git diff <start>..<end> --stat

Numeric stats for parsing

git diff <start>..<end> --numstat

Count total changes

git diff <start>..<end> --shortstat

Author breakdown (if multiple authors):

git shortlog <start>..<end> -sn

File categorization:

  • Identify new files (show in status "A")

  • Identify deleted files (show in status "D")

  • Identify renamed files (show in status "R")

  • Modified files with change magnitude

Step 4: Identify Key Files for Detailed Analysis

Prioritization rules:

  • Large changes (>100 lines modified): Always include

  • New files: Include (especially if >50 lines)

  • Deleted files: Note but don't diff

  • Architecture files: build.gradle.kts , AndroidManifest.xml , module configs

  • Test files: Flag separately for test coverage assessment

Extract key file list:

Files changed with line counts

git diff <start>..<end> --numstat | sort -rn -k1 -k2

Limit to top 10 files by default to avoid context overflow.

Step 5: Generate Selective Diffs (Based on Depth)

Concise mode: No diffs, stats only

Detailed mode: Diffs for top 3-5 key files

git diff <start>..<end> -- path/to/key/file.kt

Code Review mode: Diffs for all modified files, grouped by module

Group by directory

git diff <start>..<end> --name-only | cut -d'/' -f1-2 | sort -u

Generate diffs per module

for module in modules; do git diff <start>..<end> -- $module/ done

Context overflow protection:

  • If >10 files changed significantly, limit to top 5 diffs

  • Warn user: "Showing top 5 files by change size. Request specific files for full diffs."

Step 6: Present Structured Summary

Format based on depth:

Concise Summary

Git Session Summary

Range: <start-commit> to <end-commit> (<timeframe>) Commits: X commits by Y author(s) Files Changed: A modified, B added, C deleted Net Changes: +X -Y lines

Commits

  • abc123 Commit message 1
  • def456 Commit message 2 ...

Top Files Changed

  1. path/to/file1.kt (+50 -20)
  2. path/to/file2.kt (+30 -15) ...

Detailed Summary

Includes:

  • Full commit list with authors and timestamps

  • Complete file list with change stats

  • Author breakdown

  • Top 3-5 diffs for review

Code Review Format

Code Review Summary

Overview

  • PR Title: [Suggested from commit messages]
  • Changes: X files across Y modules
  • Scope: [Inferred from changed files]

Commits

[Formatted commit list suitable for PR description]

Changes by Module

Module: app

  • file1.kt: Description of changes
  • file2.kt: Description of changes

Module: core ...

Key Changes

[Diffs for significant modifications]

Test Coverage

  • Test files modified: X
  • New tests added: ~Y

Output Guidelines

Commit Messages

  • Show short hash (7 chars)

  • Show first line of commit message only

  • Truncate long messages to 80 chars

  • Group by author if multiple contributors

File Paths

  • Use relative paths from repo root

  • Format as code: path/to/file.kt

  • Include line change magnitude: (+X -Y)

  • Highlight file type (source, test, config)

Statistics

Present in clear tables:

MetricCount
Commits15
Files Changed23
Insertions+450
Deletions-180

Diffs

  • Include file path as header: ### path/to/file.kt

  • Use code blocks with syntax highlighting

  • Show context lines (git default: 3 lines before/after)

  • Truncate very large diffs (>200 lines) with summary

Context Budget Management

Monitor diff sizes:

  • Small session (<10 files, <500 lines): Safe for detailed mode

  • Medium session (10-30 files, 500-2000 lines): Use selective diffs

  • Large session (>30 files, >2000 lines): Concise mode with warnings

Progressive disclosure:

  • Always start with concise summary

  • Ask user: "Would you like detailed diffs for specific files?"

  • Generate diffs on demand rather than upfront

Fallback for large sessions: "This session modified 45 files with 5000+ line changes. Showing concise summary. Request specific files or modules for detailed diffs."

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Don't:

  • Generate diffs for all files in large sessions (context overflow)

  • Include full diffs without asking (waste context on unneeded details)

  • Ignore file types (treat test changes same as source changes)

  • Lose context on what user wants to know

  • Use generic summaries ("modified 10 files") without specifics

Do:

  • Ask user what level of detail they need

  • Prioritize key files by change magnitude

  • Categorize files (source, test, config, docs)

  • Provide actionable summaries

  • Offer to drill down on specific files

Success Criteria

A good git session analysis should:

  • Inform: User understands scope of changes at a glance

  • Focus: Highlights most significant changes first

  • Actionable: Provides paths and diffs for deeper review

  • Efficient: Doesn't waste context on unnecessary details

  • Adaptable: Adjusts depth based on session size and user needs

Example Outputs

See contexts/example-outputs.md for detailed examples of concise summaries and code review formats.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

avoiding-false-positives

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

retrospecting

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

classifying-review-findings

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review