subagent-driven-development

Use when executing implementation plans. Dispatches independent subagents for individual tasks with code review checkpoints between iterations for rapid, controlled development.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "subagent-driven-development" with this command: npx skills add bbeierle12/skill-mcp-claude/bbeierle12-skill-mcp-claude-subagent-driven-development

Subagent-Driven Development

Core Principle

Fresh context per task. Review between tasks.

Each task gets a clean subagent with no accumulated confusion. You review between tasks.

How It Works

  1. Load the implementation plan
  2. For each task:
    • Dispatch fresh subagent
    • Subagent implements ONLY that task
    • Review the changes
    • Approve or request fixes
    • Move to next task

Benefits

  • Clean Context: Each subagent starts fresh
  • Focused Work: One task at a time
  • Review Points: Catch issues early
  • Controlled Progress: You stay in charge

Execution Flow

Step 1: Load the Plan

Loading plan from: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-feature-name.md

Tasks identified:
1. [ ] Task 1: Description
2. [ ] Task 2: Description
3. [ ] Task 3: Description

Starting with Task 1...

Step 2: Dispatch Subagent

For each task, create a focused prompt:

## Task: [Task Name]

### Context
- Project: [brief description]
- Current branch: [branch name]
- Dependencies: [relevant info]

### Instructions
[Exact instructions from plan]

### Files to Modify
- `path/to/file.ts`

### Test to Write First
[Test code from plan]

### Implementation
[Implementation code from plan]

### Success Criteria
- [ ] Test passes
- [ ] No other tests broken
- [ ] Code follows project style

Step 3: Review Changes

After subagent completes:

## Task 1 Complete

### Changes Made:
- Modified: `path/to/file.ts` (+25/-3)
- Added: `path/to/file.test.ts` (+40)

### Test Results:
✅ All tests passing (47 total)

### Review Checklist:
- [ ] Test covers the requirement
- [ ] Implementation is correct
- [ ] No unnecessary changes
- [ ] Code style matches project

**Approve and continue to Task 2?**

Step 4: Handle Issues

If review finds problems:

## Issues Found in Task 1

1. Test doesn't cover edge case X
2. Missing error handling for Y

**Options:**
A) Request fixes from subagent
B) Fix manually
C) Skip and note for later

Which approach?

Subagent Guidelines

What Subagents Should Do

  • Follow the plan exactly
  • Write tests first
  • Make minimal changes
  • Report what was done

What Subagents Should NOT Do

  • Make "improvements" outside scope
  • Skip tests
  • Refactor unrelated code
  • Change the plan

Progress Tracking

Maintain task status:

## Progress: Feature Name

- [x] Task 1: Setup database schema ✅
- [x] Task 2: Create API endpoint ✅
- [ ] Task 3: Add validation (IN PROGRESS)
- [ ] Task 4: Write integration tests
- [ ] Task 5: Update documentation

Current: Task 3 of 5

Checkpoints

After Each Task

  • Run all tests
  • Review diff
  • Commit if approved

After All Tasks

  • Run integration tests
  • Manual verification
  • Final review

Rollback

If things go wrong:

# Revert last task
git revert HEAD

# Or reset to checkpoint
git reset --hard <commit-before-task>

Communication Pattern

Starting

"I'm using subagent-driven-development to implement [feature]. I'll dispatch a fresh subagent for each task and review between them."

Between Tasks

"Task [N] complete. Changes: [summary]. Ready to review before Task [N+1]?"

Completing

"All [N] tasks complete. Running final verification..."

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

frontend-dev-guidelines

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

backend-dev-guidelines

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

test-driven-development

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review