anti-hype-filter

Detect hype cycles and neutralize emotional triggers by rewriting claims into verifiable structures and explicit risk/uncertainty.

Safety Notice

This listing is from the official public ClawHub registry. Review SKILL.md and referenced scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "anti-hype-filter" with this command: npx skills add AgentSmith/anti-hype-filter

SKILL: anti-hype-filter

Purpose

Detect and neutralize hype cycles before they distort system integrity by stripping emotional triggers and replacing them with structural analysis.

When to Use

  • "guaranteed", "moon", "100x", "alpha" style language
  • Urgency without substance ("now or never")
  • Social proof without evidence
  • Claims that minimize risk or constraints

Inputs

  • text (required): message to evaluate
  • context (optional):
    • domain (token|product|governance|community)
  • policy (required):
    • hype_terms (optional list; if omitted, use the embedded default set in this skill)
    • max_response_words (default 100)

Steps

  1. Extract key claims (1-5).
  2. Detect hype triggers:
    • urgency framing
    • certainty language
    • vague upside claims
    • social proof substitution
  3. Classify:
    • signal, noise, or manipulation_risk
  4. Rewrite the message into a verifiable form:
    • replace certainty with uncertainty
    • add required missing variables (data window, metrics, constraints)
  5. Draft a minimal response that:
    • does not repeat hype memes verbatim
    • demands evidence and risk disclosure

Validation

  • If classification is manipulation_risk, provide at least 1 falsifiable request for evidence.
  • Do not amplify hype phrases; paraphrase instead.

Output

  • anti_hype_result:
    • classification ("signal"|"noise"|"manipulation_risk")
    • detected_triggers (list)
    • missing_information (list)
    • rewrite (verifiable version)
    • response_draft (string)

Safety Rules

  • Never accuse individuals of malice without evidence; label as "risk" not "intent".
  • No financial promises.
  • No deception; no fabricated data.

Example

Input: "This will 100x in 2 weeks, everyone knows." Output: manipulation_risk, missing evidence, rewrite into metrics/timeframe/assumptions, and a short demand for proof + risk disclosure.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

一个智能的业务需求转研发文档工具。AI 自主分析项目代码库,理解业务需求,参考实际代码,生成可直接执行的研发文档。支持任意技术栈,无需配置。

Smart business-to-dev requirement translator. AI first analyzes and memorizes project structure, then understands business requirements, references actual co...

Registry SourceRecently Updated
2561Profile unavailable
Coding

Build

The Autonomous Construction and Synthesis Engine. Standardizing the process of turning abstract intent into concrete digital and physical structures.

Registry SourceRecently Updated
5240Profile unavailable
Web3

Strategic Orchestration

Coordinate agents toward a unified objective; assign roles, sequence work, prevent conflicts, and define success criteria.

Registry SourceRecently Updated
610Profile unavailable
Coding

Reality Check

Prevent bad strategic decisions by surfacing assumptions, testing feasibility, and exposing critical flaws before execution.

Registry SourceRecently Updated
740Profile unavailable