groove-groovebook-review

Outcome

Open learning PRs in the groovebook repo are listed; the user reviews one and submits a reaction (approve, comment, or request changes).

Acceptance Criteria

• Open PRs are listed with title, author, and date
• User selects a PR to review; diff and body are shown
• User submits a reaction via gh pr review

Steps

1. Read groovebook: from .groove/index.md; if absent, exit with: groovebook is not configured. Add 'groovebook: <owner>/<repo>' to .groove/index.md to enable.

2. Check gh auth status; if not authenticated, exit with: Not authenticated with GitHub. Run: gh auth login

3. List open PRs:

   gh pr list --repo <groovebook> --state open --json number,title,author,createdAt
   

   • If none open: print "No open learning PRs in <groovebook>." and exit
   • Display as a numbered list: N. #<number> — <title> (by <author>, <date>)

4. Ask: "Which PR would you like to review? (enter number or PR #)"

5. Show the PR:

   • gh pr view <number> --repo <groovebook> — show body
   • gh pr diff <number> --repo <groovebook> — show diff

6. Ask: "Your reaction? (approve / comment / request-changes)"

   • If comment: ask for the comment text
   • If request-changes: ask for the request text
   • If approve: confirm intent

7. Submit:

   gh pr review <number> --repo <groovebook> --<approve|comment|request-changes> --body "<text>"
   

   For approve: gh pr review <number> --repo <groovebook> --approve

8. Confirm submission and print the PR URL.

9. Optional follow-up: ask "Does this learning suggest a change to a groove skill? If so, consider opening a companion PR to the groove repo referencing this groovebook PR."

Constraints

• Read-only until step 7 — do not modify any local files
• If gh pr diff output is very large (>200 lines), show only the first 50 lines and note it's truncated
• The approve reaction should always ask for confirmation before submitting — approvals are harder to undo than comments