skill-reviewer

Identify improvement opportunities in Claude Code skills through targeted review operations. Complements review-multi by focusing on actionable improvements rather than scoring. Use when seeking specific improvements, conducting improvement-focused reviews, or identifying enhancement opportunities for existing skills.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "skill-reviewer" with this command: npx skills add adaptationio/skrillz/adaptationio-skrillz-skill-reviewer

Skill Reviewer

Overview

skill-reviewer identifies specific, actionable improvements for Claude Code skills. While review-multi provides comprehensive scoring (1-5), skill-reviewer focuses on finding and documenting improvement opportunities.

Purpose: Improvement discovery for existing skills

Integration with review-multi:

  • review-multi: Comprehensive scoring, production readiness
  • skill-reviewer: Improvement hunting, enhancement focus
  • Use together: review-multi scores, skill-reviewer improves

The 4 Review Operations:

  1. Content Enhancement Review - Find content that could be clearer, more complete, better examples
  2. Usability Improvement Review - Identify user experience enhancements
  3. Integration Opportunity Review - Find integration and composition opportunities
  4. Efficiency Improvement Review - Identify ways to make skill more efficient

When to Use

  • Finding improvements for good skills (score 4-5 but could be better)
  • Post-deployment enhancement planning
  • Continuous improvement iterations
  • User feedback incorporation
  • Periodic skill refreshes

Operations

Operation 1: Content Enhancement Review

Focus: Better examples, clearer explanations, additional scenarios

Process:

  1. Review examples - could any be more concrete/helpful?
  2. Check explanations - any unclear sections?
  3. Review scenarios - missing important use cases?
  4. Check completeness - any gaps?

Output: List of content improvements with priorities


Operation 2: Usability Improvement Review

Focus: Easier to use, faster to learn, more effective

Process:

  1. Test actual usage - where's friction?
  2. Check learning curve - could it be easier?
  3. Review navigation - could it be clearer?
  4. Check Quick Reference - could it be more helpful?

Output: UX improvement opportunities


Operation 3: Integration Opportunity Review

Focus: Better integration with other skills, new composition possibilities

Process:

  1. Review skill dependencies - could integration be smoother?
  2. Check for workflow opportunities - could this compose with others?
  3. Look for synergies - which skills work well together?
  4. Identify gaps - what's missing for good integration?

Output: Integration enhancement opportunities


Operation 4: Efficiency Improvement Review

Focus: Faster to use, better automation, reduced effort

Process:

  1. Check for automation opportunities
  2. Review process efficiency - any unnecessary steps?
  3. Look for shortcuts - quick paths for common cases?
  4. Check token efficiency - context optimization possible?

Output: Efficiency improvement opportunities


Quick Reference

OperationFocusOutput
Content EnhancementExamples, clarity, scenariosContent improvements
Usability ImprovementUX, learning curve, frictionUX enhancements
Integration OpportunityComposition, synergiesIntegration ideas
Efficiency ImprovementAutomation, speedEfficiency gains

Use with: review-multi (scoring) + skill-reviewer (improvements) + skill-updater (apply changes)


skill-reviewer finds improvement opportunities to make good skills even better.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

supabase-cli

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

codex-cli

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

task-development

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

multi-ai-code-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review