agent-review

Use this skill when you need to get human feedback on code changes you've made.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "agent-review" with this command: npx skills add 4shub/agent-review/4shub-agent-review-agent-review

Code Review Skill

Use this skill when you need to get human feedback on code changes you've made.

When to Use This Skill

  • After implementing features or fixes

  • Before committing significant changes

  • When you want user feedback on your approach

  • When the user explicitly asks you to review your code

Installation

If agent-review isn't installed:

npm install -g agent-review

or run directly: npx agent-review

How to Use

Step 1: Run the Code Review Tool

CRITICAL: Always run agent-review inline (not in background) with a long timeout:

Bash({ command: "npx agent-review", description: "Start code review session", timeout: 600000, // 10 minutes - user needs time to review })

DO NOT:

  • ❌ Use run_in_background: true

  • ❌ Use default timeout (2 minutes is too short)

  • ❌ Poll bash output with BashOutput

WHY:

  • The tool blocks until user submits review

  • Running inline means you automatically get output when done

  • User needs time to review code and add comments

  • Feedback is printed to stdout when complete

Step 2: Automatically Read the Review Feedback

After the tool completes, read the structured JSON feedback:

Read({ file_path: "/path/to/project/.agent-review/latest-review.json" })

This gives you structured data with:

  • Line-by-line comments (file, line number, comment text)

  • General feedback

  • Review statistics

Step 3: Act on the Feedback

Process the review feedback:

  • Read line comments - Address each specific suggestion

  • Read general feedback - Consider overall recommendations

  • Make changes - Implement requested fixes

  • Explain - Tell the user what you changed and why

Example Workflow

// 1. Run code review (inline, long timeout) const result = await Bash({ command: "npx agent-review", description: "Request code review from user", timeout: 600000, // 10 min });

// 2. Read structured feedback const reviewData = await Read({ file_path: ".agent-review/latest-review.json" });

// 3. Parse and process const review = JSON.parse(reviewData);

// 4. Address feedback for (const comment of review.feedback.lineComments) { console.log(${comment.file}:${comment.line} - ${comment.comment}); // Make changes based on comment }

// 5. Report back to user "I've addressed your feedback:

  • Fixed the issue in src/app.ts:42 (using const instead of let)
  • Updated error handling as suggested ..."

Review Data Structure

The .agent-review/latest-review.json file contains:

{ "id": "review-1234567890", "timestamp": "2026-02-03T17:23:33.377Z", "diff": { /* full git diff data */ }, "feedback": { "timestamp": "2026-02-03T17:23:33.377Z", "lineComments": [ { "file": "src/app.ts", "line": 42, "oldLine": 41, "comment": "Consider using const instead of let", "context": "let x = calculateTotal();" } ], "generalFeedback": "Overall looks good!", "stats": { "filesReviewed": 5, "commentsAdded": 3 } } }

Best Practices

  • Always run inline - Never use background mode

  • Use long timeout - 600000ms (10 min) minimum

  • Auto-read feedback - Don't ask user to tell you the feedback

  • Address all comments - Go through each line comment

  • Summarize changes - Tell user what you fixed

Common Mistakes to Avoid

❌ Running in background:

// WRONG - you won't get the output automatically Bash({ command: "npx agent-review", run_in_background: true })

❌ Short timeout:

// WRONG - will timeout before user finishes Bash({ command: "npx agent-review", timeout: 120000 // 2 min too short })

❌ Asking user for feedback:

// WRONG - feedback is already in the JSON file! "What feedback do you have?"

✅ Correct usage:

// RIGHT - inline, long timeout, auto-read await Bash({ command: "npx agent-review", timeout: 600000 });

const review = await Read({ file_path: ".agent-review/latest-review.json" });

Tips

  • Before review: Tell user what changed: "I've implemented X feature across 5 files. Ready for review?"

  • During review: The tool auto-opens browser and waits for user

  • After review: Process feedback immediately and show user your changes

  • Commit option: User can choose to commit during review - check the bash output

Remember: Always run inline with long timeout, then auto-read the JSON feedback!

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

agent-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

agent-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

agent-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

openclaw-version-monitor

监控 OpenClaw GitHub 版本更新,获取最新版本发布说明,翻译成中文, 并推送到 Telegram 和 Feishu。用于:(1) 定时检查版本更新 (2) 推送版本更新通知 (3) 生成中文版发布说明

Archived SourceRecently Updated